Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.6K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.6K
Correlations02:20

Correlations

36.8K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
36.8K
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

43.6K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
43.6K
Correlation01:09

Correlation

15.5K
In statistics, two variables are said to be correlated if the values of one variable are associated with the other variable. Depending on the relationship between two variables, correlation can be of three types– positive correlation, negative correlation, and zero correlation.
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
15.5K
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

500
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
500
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.6K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ant distribution patterns in a cameroonian cocoa plantation: investigation of the ant mosaic hypothesis.

Oecologia·2017
Same author

Evaluation of the Pulmonary Toxicity of Ambient Particulate Matter From Camp Victory, Iraq.

Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A·2015
Same author

Immortalised breast epithelia survive prolonged DNA replication stress and return to cycle from a senescent-like state.

Cell death & disease·2014
Same author

Transversal and longitudinal images from the retina of the living eye using low coherence reflectometry.

Journal of biomedical optics·2012
Same author

Optical in-fiber bragg grating sensor systems for medical applications.

Journal of biomedical optics·2012
Same author

Repeated antenatal corticosteroid treatments adversely affect neural transmission time and auditory thresholds in laboratory rats.

Neurotoxicology and teratology·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
07:11

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis

Published on: November 10, 2023

3.4K

The spectre of 'spurious' correlations.

D A Jackson1, K M Somers1

  • 1Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, M5S 1A1, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Oecologia
|March 18, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Ecologists frequently use ratios and indices to standardize ecological data, but these methods can create misleading correlations. Randomization tests offer a robust solution for analyzing such data and identifying true relationships.

Keywords:
Data standardizationRandomization testsRatiosSpurious correlationStatistical inference

More Related Videos

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

7.6K
Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis
05:59

Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis

Published on: October 6, 2023

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
07:11

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis

Published on: November 10, 2023

3.4K
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

7.6K
Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis
05:59

Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis

Published on: October 6, 2023

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Statistical Ecology
  • Ecological Data Analysis

Background:

  • Ecologists commonly use ratios and indices to standardize data, aiming to remove the influence of confounding variables like 'size effects'.
  • The statistical implications of employing these standardized measures in correlation and regression analyses are not widely understood.
  • Standardization techniques can inadvertently introduce biases and affect the interpretation of ecological relationships.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the potential for 'spurious' correlations arising from the use of ratios and indices in ecological data analysis.
  • To propose and advocate for alternative statistical methods that mitigate the risks associated with data standardization.
  • To highlight the critical importance of selecting appropriate null hypotheses when evaluating statistical relationships in ecological studies.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the properties of ratios and indices commonly used in ecological research.
  • Demonstration of how these properties can lead to unexpected and potentially erroneous statistical results ('spurious' correlations).
  • Advocacy for the use of randomization tests as a reliable method for hypothesis testing in the presence of potential confounding factors.

Main Results:

  • Ratios and indices, while intended for standardization, often exhibit unusual statistical properties that can generate misleading correlations.
  • These 'spurious' correlations can obscure true ecological relationships or suggest non-existent ones.
  • The study demonstrates the effectiveness of randomization tests in providing more reliable assessments of ecological hypotheses.

Conclusions:

  • The application of ratios and indices in ecological data analysis requires careful consideration due to their propensity to create spurious correlations.
  • Randomization tests are recommended as a robust statistical approach to evaluate hypotheses when dealing with standardized ecological data.
  • Correctly identifying the null correlation is crucial for accurate statistical evaluation, a step often overlooked in ecological research.