Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.

Energy Budgets

Energy Budgets

Organisms must balance energy intake with the energy required for growth, maintenance and reproduction. These trade-offs result in a variety of survivorship and reproductive strategies, including semelparity and iteroparity. Semelparous species, like annual plants, have only one reproductive episode in their lifetimes and consequently have short lifespans. Iteroparous species, by contrast, have many reproductive events during their lifetimes but have relatively few offspring. These two...

Ecological Niches

Ecological Niches

All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.

Conservation of Small Populations

Conservation of Small Populations

Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...

Types of Selection

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...

Limits to Natural Selection

Limits to Natural Selection

Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

MORPHOLOGICAL PLASTICITY AND MINERAL NUTRIENT CAPTURE IN TWO HERBACEOUS SPECIES OF CONTRASTED ECOLOGY.

The New phytologist·2021

Same author

THE ECOLOGY OF SPECIES, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES OF THE CONTEMPORARY BRITISH FLORA.

The New phytologist·2018

Same author

Population differences in Trifolium repens L. response to ultraviolet-B radiation: foliar chemistry and consequences for two lepidopteran herbivores.

Oecologia·2017

Same author

Top-down control and its effect on the biomass and composition of three grasses at high and low soil fertility in outdoor microcosms.

Oecologia·2017

Same author

The impact of elevated CO<sub>2</sub> on plant-herbivore interactions: experimental evidence of moderating effects at the community level.

Oecologia·2017

Same author

Response of Trifolium repens to UV-B radiation: morphological links to plant productivity and water availability.

Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)·2011

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Published on: April 23, 2016

A trade-off between scale and precision in resource foraging.

B D Campbell¹, J P Grime¹, J M L Mackey¹

¹Unit of Comparative Plant Ecology (NERC), Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, The University, S10 2TN, Sheffield, UK.

|March 18, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Plant morphological plasticity influences resource competition. Root and shoot foraging traits are interdependent, affecting how plants compete for light and nutrients, which may maintain plant community diversity.

Keywords:

Dominance Dry matter allocation Plasticity Resource competition Resource foraging

More Related Videos

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

Published on: October 20, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Published on: April 23, 2016

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

Published on: October 20, 2019

Area of Science:

Ecology
Plant Biology
Evolutionary Biology

Background:

Morphological plasticity in plants is crucial for resource competition.
Understanding the interplay between root and shoot foraging strategies is key to plant community dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the relationship between root and shoot foraging characteristics in herbaceous plants under varying resource conditions.
To determine how morphological plasticity influences competitive abilities for light and mineral nutrients.

Main Methods:

Assayed foraging characteristics of leaf canopies and root systems in eight herbaceous plants.
Utilized novel techniques for controlled patchiness in light and mineral nutrient supply.
Compared results with conventional competition experiments.

Main Results:

Demonstrated a positive association between root and shoot foraging characteristics in patchy environments.
Supported the hypothesis of interdependence between competitive abilities for light and mineral nutrients.
Identified differences in foraging scale and precision between dominant and subordinate plants.

Conclusions:

A trade-off exists between the scale of resource interception (high in dominants) and precision (high in subordinates).
This trade-off in resource foraging contributes to the maintenance of diversity in competing plant communities.