Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

06:03
A Push-pull Protocol to Reduce Colonization of Bird Nest Boxes by Honey Bees
Published on: September 4, 2016
9.1K
Predation on nests: a case of apparent competition
1Konrad Lorenz Institut für Vergleichende Verhaltensforschung, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Savoyenstrasse 1A, A-1160, Vienna, Austria.
Oecologia
|March 18, 2017
Summary
Predator-prey interactions reveal indirect effects in vertebrate communities. Increased nest density boosts predation rates, demonstrating how one prey type can impact another through shared predators.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Behavioral Ecology
- Community Ecology
Background:
- Indirect effects are crucial in understanding community dynamics, particularly in predator-prey systems.
- Previous research has explored density-dependent predation but lacked experimental evidence in vertebrate communities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally evaluate indirect effects within a simple prey community sharing common predators.
- To investigate how the density of one prey type influences predation rates on another.
Main Methods:
- A field experiment using artificial nests to mimic a simple prey community.
- Manipulating the density of two types of artificial nests to simulate prey.
- Analyzing predation rates in relation to nest density and type.
Main Results:
- Predation rates increased with nest density when only a single prey type was present.
- Increasing the density of one artificial nest type significantly increased the predation rate on the other nest type.
- No observer effect on nest predation was detected due to density-dependent scent marking.
Conclusions:
- This study provides the first experimental evidence of indirect effects in vertebrate communities.
- The findings suggest that indirect interactions mediated by shared predators can influence community structure.
- These indirect effects may help explain aggressive behaviors observed in some animal communities.
Related Concept Videos
Competition
25.2K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
25.2K
Predator-Prey Interactions
22.0K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
22.0K
Conservation of Declining Populations
13.5K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
13.5K
Ecological Niches
27.1K
All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.
27.1K
Optimal Foraging
14.1K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.1K
Mate Choice
11.9K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
11.9K

