Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026
5/6 Nephrectomy Using Sharp Bipolectomy Via Midline Laparotomy in Rats
Published on: April 4, 2025
Prediction of Postoperative Risks in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Using RENAL, Mayo Adhesive Probability and
Simone Bier1, Stefan Aufderklamm2, Tilman Todenhöfer2
1Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany simone.bier@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Aim:
To evaluate the Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score, renal pelvis score, and RENAL nephrometry score for the prediction of surgical outcome in patients with renal masses undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy at a single center.
Patients And Methods:
A total of 280 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy were identified retrospectively. Thirty-eight patients were excluded because of a lack of preoperative imaging. The outcome measures included surgical technique, patient characteristics, MAP score, renal-pelvis-score, RENAL nephrometry score, and complication rates according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Regression analysis was performed for assessment of the predictive value of the given scores.
Results:
Complications occurred after 32 (13%) operations. There was a significant positive association between the development of complications and RENAL nephrometry score (p=0.003). Prediction of complications was improved by the RENAL nephrometry score [area under the curve (AUC) =0.675] and the MAP score (AUC=0.655): With an increasing MAP score, there was a significantly increased operative time (p=0.033). The renal pelvis score had a minor predicitive role (AUC=0.516) and no correlation was found with postoperative urine leakage.
Conclusion:
The MAP score and RENAL nephrometry score seem to be able to predict a complex or complicated intra- and postoperative course, while the renal pelvis score is not suitable for predicting postoperative complications, especially urine leakage.
