Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

15:00
Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
Published on: August 18, 2023
4.5K
Evaluating Methods of Updating Training Data in Long-Term Genomewide Selection
Jeffrey L Neyhart1, Tyler Tiede1, Aaron J Lorenz1
1Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108.
G3 (Bethesda, Md.)
|March 20, 2017
Summary
Updating training populations in genomewide selection can improve genetic gains. Using recent data and selecting the best lines maintains prediction accuracy over time in barley breeding.
Area of Science:
- Plant breeding
- Quantitative genetics
- Genomics
Background:
- Genomewide selection (GWS) accelerates genetic gains but prediction accuracy can decrease over breeding cycles due to changing linkage disequilibrium (LD).
- Previous studies highlight the need to update training populations to maintain accuracy, but optimal update strategies remain unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate optimal methods for updating training populations in GWS to sustain prediction accuracy and response to selection.
- To evaluate the impact of different update strategies and data inclusion methods in a barley breeding simulation.
Main Methods:
- A barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) breeding simulation was used to compare updating strategies: best predicted lines, worst predicted lines, both, random lines, criterion-selected lines, or no update.
- Prediction accuracy and response to selection were assessed over multiple breeding cycles.
- The effect of using all historical data versus only recent data in the training population was also examined.
Main Results:
- In the short term, updating with the best predicted lines or both best and worst predicted lines yielded high prediction accuracy and genetic gain.
- Over the long term, all update methods (except no update) showed similar performance.
- Using a smaller, more recent training population provided a slight advantage in prediction accuracy and genetic gain compared to using all data.
Conclusions:
- Updating the training population is crucial for maintaining prediction accuracy in GWS.
- While several update methods are effective in the short term, their long-term performance converges.
- Employing a recent, focused training dataset offers a practical and effective approach for breeders to optimize genetic gains.
Related Concept Videos
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
7.1K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
7.1K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
8.3K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
In contrast, regions which code...
8.3K

