Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
Long-term outcomes and cost effectiveness of high-dose dexamethasone for cardiac surgery: a randomised trial
J M Dieleman1, G A de Wit2, A P Nierich3
1Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Insights
Intra-operative dexamethasone did not improve major adverse events after cardiac surgery but significantly reduced costs. This suggests routine use may be cost-effective for patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Intra-operative dexamethasone may improve short-term outcomes in cardiac surgery.
- Long-term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness require further evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess long-term clinical outcomes (12 months) after cardiac surgery.
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone versus placebo.
Main Methods:
- Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (DECS).
- 1 mg.kg-1 dexamethasone or placebo administered intra-operatively.
- Follow-up for 12 months post-surgery, evaluating major adverse events and costs.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in major postoperative events (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.03; p=0.1).
- Dexamethasone reduced costs by £921 (€1084) per patient (p=0.02).
- Cost reduction primarily due to decreased respiratory failure and shorter hospital stays.
Conclusions:
- Intra-operative high-dose dexamethasone does not impact major adverse events at 12 months post-cardiac surgery.
- Dexamethasone administration is associated with significant cost reductions.
- Routine dexamethasone use is likely cost-effective at standard thresholds.
Abstract:
Prophylactic intra-operative administration of dexamethasone may improve short-term clinical outcomes in cardiac surgical patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of dexamethasone versus placebo. Patients included in the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled DExamethasone for Cardiac Surgery (DECS) trial were followed up for 12 months after their cardiac surgical procedure. In the DECS trial, patients received a single intra-operative dose of dexamethasone 1 mg.kg-1 (n = 2239) or placebo (n = 2255). The effects on the incidence of major postoperative events were evaluated. Also, overall costs for the 12-month postoperative period, and cost effectiveness, were compared between groups. Of 4494 randomised patients, 4457 patients (99%) were followed up until 12 months after surgery. There was no difference in the incidence of major postoperative events, the relative risk (95%CI) being 0.86 (0.72-1.03); p = 0.1. Treatment with dexamethasone reduced costs per patient by £921 [€1084] (95%CI £-1672 to -137; p = 0.02), mainly through reduction of postoperative respiratory failure and duration of postoperative hospital stay. The probability of dexamethasone being cost effective compared with placebo was 97% at a threshold value of £17,000 [€20,000] per quality-adjusted life year. We conclude that intra-operative high-dose dexamethasone did not have an effect on major adverse events at 12 months after cardiac surgery, but was associated with a reduction in costs. Routine dexamethasone administration is expected to be cost effective at commonly accepted threshold levels for cost effectiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
