Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

914
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
914
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

500
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
500
Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records01:18

Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records

1.1K
Maintaining nurses' educational and administrative records in healthcare settings, including hospitals and nursing schools, is paramount. Here's a breakdown of the types of academic records mentioned:
1.1K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.2K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.5K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

443
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
443

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automated deep-learning quantification of intramuscular fat in lumbar spine muscles on Dixon MRI: validation and normative reference values from 173 healthy adults.

BMC medical imaging·2026
Same author

Burden of mental disorders in working-age populations (15-64 years) from 1990 to 2021 with projections to 2045: a global analysis of India, China and the United States.

International journal of clinical pharmacy·2026
Same author

Conversion total hip arthroplasty following failed proximal femoral fixation: current concepts review.

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy·2026
Same author

The Management of Neurological Injuries Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2025
Same author

CORR Synthesis: What Is the Role of Robotic Technology in THA?

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2025
Same author

Modality-AGnostic image Cascade (MAGIC) for multi-modality cardiac substructure segmentation.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

Registry Data-Valuable Lessons But Beware the Confounders.

John G Stammers1, Alex Kuo2, Alister J Hart1

  • 1Joint Reconstruction Unit, UCL Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science and the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex, United Kingdom.

The Journal of Arthroplasty
|March 21, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

National joint registries effectively track orthopedic trends and guide practice. However, observed correlations do not imply causation, and confounding factors must be considered in observational data analysis.

Keywords:
bearing articulationjoint arthroplastyjoint registryoutcomesrevision

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering
09:43

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Published on: November 22, 2019

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering
09:43

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Published on: November 22, 2019

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Health informatics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Mature national joint registries offer valuable data for orthopedic research.
  • Widespread adoption and auditing enhance registry reliability and impact.
  • Observational data analysis presents challenges in establishing causality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of a mature national joint registry in demonstrating orthopedic practice trends.
  • To highlight the importance of distinguishing correlation from causation in registry data.
  • To emphasize the necessity of addressing confounding variables in observational studies.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from a mature national joint registry.
  • Statistical methods to identify correlations within the registry data.
  • Review of principles for analyzing observational datasets.

Main Results:

  • A well-established national joint registry can successfully illustrate trends in orthopedic surgery.
  • Correlations between variables can be identified within registry data.
  • The potential for misinterpretation of correlation as causality is significant.

Conclusions:

  • Mature national joint registries are powerful tools for understanding and influencing orthopedic practice.
  • Careful consideration of confounding is crucial when interpreting registry data to avoid causal misattributions.
  • Statistical rigor is essential for valid conclusions from observational orthopedic data.