Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Manual Muscle Testing: A Method of Measuring Extremity Muscle Strength Applied to Critically Ill Patients
Published on: April 12, 2011
Standardized Method to Measure Muscle Force at the Bedside in Hemodialysis Patients
Jean-Sébastien Souweine1, Agathe Boudet2, Leila Chenine3
1Department of Biochemistry, University Hospital of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; PhyMedExp, UMR CNRS 9214, Inserm U1046, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Objectives:
In hemodialysis, diminution of muscle strength constitutes a major prognostic factor of mortality. Currently, measurement of quadriceps isometric maximal voluntary force (MVF) represents the reference method to investigate muscle strength. However, reduction of MVF is rarely detected in these patients due to the absence of portative bedside tools in clinical practice. The purposes of this study were therefore to assess the agreement of a belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer (HHD) with the dynamometer chair (reference method) and to determine intratester and intertester reliability of the quadriceps MVF measurements using belt-stabilized HHD in healthy subjects and in hemodialysis patients.
Design:
Repeated-measures cross-sectional study.
Setting:
Clinical and academic hospital.
Participants:
Fifty-three healthy adult subjects (23 males, 36.5 + 12.5 y.o.) and 21 hemodialysis patients (14 males, 72.4 + 13.3 y.o., dialysis vintage 30 + 75.1 months).
Intervention:
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure:
MVF measurements were assessed with belt-stabilized HHD and dynamometer chair, by two independent investigators. The agreement between the two devices would be quantified using the Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement (LOA) method and the Spearman correlation.
Results:
For healthy subjects and hemodialysis patients, Spearman coefficients between belt-stabilized HHD and dynamometer chair were 0.63 and 0.75, respectively (P < .05). In hemodialysis group, reliability was excellent for both the intratester and intertester reliability R2 = 0.85 (P < .01) and R2 = 0.90 (P < .01), respectively. In all individuals, the mean difference between the dynamometer chair and the belt-stabilized HHD was -13.07 ± 21.77 N.m. (P < .001). The LOA for the upper and the lower was 29.59 and -55.73 N.m., respectively.
Conclusion:
In healthy subjects and in hemodialysis patients, the belt-stabilized HHD dynamometer appears as a valid and reliable method to measure in clinical practice isometric MVF of quadriceps in hemodialysis patients. Therefore, the belt-stabilized HHD appears as a suitable and a relevant diagnostic tool for the identification of muscle dysfunction in hemodialysis patients.
More Related Videos
11:30Measurement of Maximum Isometric Force Generated by Permeabilized Skeletal Muscle Fibers
Published on: June 16, 2015
09:04Skeletal Muscle Neurovascular Coupling, Oxidative Capacity, and Microvascular Function with 'One Stop Shop' Near-infrared Spectroscopy
Published on: February 20, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis I: Introduction