Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

08:39
Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing
Published on: September 1, 2017
8.2K
Inbreeding depression maintained by recessive lethal mutations interacting with stabilizing selection on quantitative
Russell Lande1,2, Emmanuelle Porcher3
1Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, United Kingdom.
Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution
|March 22, 2017
Summary
This study analyzes mutation effects on genetic variation using models of lethals and stabilizing selection. Interactions between inbreeding depression and quantitative traits influence the purging of deleterious mutations.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary genetics
- Population genetics
- Quantitative genetics
Background:
- Mutations have varying fitness effects, categorized as early-acting strongly deleterious recessive or late-acting mildly deleterious.
- Understanding these effects is crucial for analyzing genetic variation and inbreeding depression in populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the bimodal distribution of fitness effects of mutations and standing genetic variation.
- To investigate the combined effects of lethals, selfing, and stabilizing selection on genetic variance and mutation purging.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Kondrashov model for lethals (K).
- Integrated the infinitesimal model for selfing (IMS) and the Gaussian allele model (GAM) for quantitative genetic variance.
- Analyzed combined models (KIMS and KGAM) under stabilizing selection.
Main Results:
- High mutation rates and weak stabilizing selection create interactions between early and late inbreeding depression.
- Alternative stable equilibria can exist at intermediate selfing rates.
- Stabilizing selection can either facilitate or interfere with the purging of nearly recessive lethals, depending on selfing rates.
Conclusions:
- The interplay between quantitative genetic variance evolution and purging of lethals is significant.
- Stabilizing selection's effect on purging depends on the relative thresholds for quantitative variance and lethal purging.
- Model predictions highlight complex dynamics in the maintenance of genetic variation and the impact of inbreeding.
Related Concept Videos
Frequency-dependent Selection
24.4K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.4K
Types of Selection
45.7K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
45.7K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
65.2K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
65.2K
Law of Segregation
79.0K
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
79.0K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
77.0K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
77.0K
Incomplete Dominance
31.4K
Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
31.4K

