Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

5.2K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
5.2K
Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

6.2K
Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
6.2K
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview01:26

Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview

1.6K
Drugs, the chemical agents used in diagnosing, treating, or preventing diseases, undergo a four-phase process of development: pharmaceutic, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and therapeutic.
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
1.6K
Drug Discovery: Overview01:26

Drug Discovery: Overview

12.5K
Drug discovery is a multifaceted process involving extensive screening, testing, and optimization of lead compounds to identify potential new drugs for therapeutic use. It combines several approaches, including screening large numbers of natural products, chemical modification of known active molecules, identification of new drug targets, and rational design based on biological mechanisms and drug-receptor structure. These approaches are carried out in both academic research laboratories and...
12.5K
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design01:28

Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design

1.9K
Drug design is a dynamic field that involves discovering and developing new medications based on specific biological targets. This process heavily relies on structure-activity relationships (SAR) and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) to guide the design and optimization of efficient drugs.
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
1.9K
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation01:10

In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation

449
In vitro dissolution and drug release tests assess how quickly and how much of a drug is released from its dosage form into an aqueous medium under standardized laboratory conditions. These tests are essential tools in pharmaceutical development and quality assurance, offering insight into the drug's performance before clinical use.During formulation development, dissolution testing identifies incomplete or inconsistent drug release issues. It also supports decisions on selecting the optimal...
449

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Myeloid-avid mammalian target of rapamycin-inhibiting nanobiologic attenuates allograft fibrosis after lung transplantation.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2026
Same author

An Examination of Digital Media and Device-Related Problems in Pediatric Hospital Visits for Psychiatric Crises.

JAACAP open·2026
Same author

Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Patients With Long De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions: Insights From the REC-CAGEFREE I Trial.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2026
Same author

Oral Nutritional Supplements and Body Composition Outcomes Among GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Users: Real-World Evidence.

Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy·2026
Same author

Screening rates and geographical disparities shape venous thromboembolism risk after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of cardiothoracic surgery·2026
Same author

Digital Media and Device-Related Conflicts During Pediatric Mental Health Boarding.

Pediatric emergency care·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
05:10

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System

Published on: December 11, 2016

10.3K

A nested group sequential framework for regional evaluation in global drug development program.

William Wang1, Zhiwei Jiang1,2, Jingjun Qiu1,2

  • 1a Biostatistics and Research Decision Science , Merck Research Laboratory, Merck & Co., Inc ., Beijing , China.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|March 22, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a nested group sequential program to improve the evaluation of regional efficacy in multiregional clinical trials (MRCTs). The method enhances flexibility and controls statistical errors during drug development.

Keywords:
Discounting factorMRCTglobal drug developmentnested group sequential designsample size estimationvirtual trial

More Related Videos

Non-Destructive Evaluation of Regional Cell Density Within Tumor Aggregates Following Drug Treatment
10:13

Non-Destructive Evaluation of Regional Cell Density Within Tumor Aggregates Following Drug Treatment

Published on: June 21, 2022

2.7K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
05:10

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System

Published on: December 11, 2016

10.3K
Non-Destructive Evaluation of Regional Cell Density Within Tumor Aggregates Following Drug Treatment
10:13

Non-Destructive Evaluation of Regional Cell Density Within Tumor Aggregates Following Drug Treatment

Published on: June 21, 2022

2.7K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Pharmacometrics

Background:

  • Multiregional clinical trials (MRCTs) assess regional efficacy and generalizability.
  • Evaluating target region consistency with overall results is standard practice.
  • Existing frameworks like Huang et al.'s (2012) for simultaneous global drug development programs (SGDDP) require further operational consideration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel nested group sequential program for regional efficacy evaluation within MRCTs.
  • To extend the SGDDP framework by incorporating interim analyses during both MRCT and local clinical trial (LCT) phases.
  • To enhance the control of family-wise type I error and increase program flexibility.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed program allows interim analyses after the MRCT and during the LCT phase.
  • A virtual trial approach using a discounting factor is introduced for LCT sample size estimation.
  • An iteration method calculates sample size and interim analysis stopping boundaries.

Main Results:

  • The nested group sequential program effectively controls the family-wise type I error rate.
  • The proposed sample size estimation method was validated through simulations.
  • The impact of varying weights, target ethnic (TE) population effect sizes, and design settings was explored.

Conclusions:

  • The nested group sequential program offers a flexible and statistically robust approach for regional efficacy evaluation in MRCTs.
  • The method provides a valuable extension to existing SGDDP frameworks.
  • The approach is applicable across various endpoint types, including normal, binary, and survival data.