Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.2K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

342
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
342
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

7.2K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.2K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

510
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
510
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

677
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
677

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PFAS free chemically amplified resists enabled by low activation energy hydrocarbon cage monomers.

Chemical science·2026
Same author

LLM-Driven Extraction of NI-RADS and Imaging Tumor Characteristics to Enhance Oropharyngeal Cancer Survivorship Surveillance.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Overcoming Paradigm Inertia: Publishing Incentives and Peer Review Bias as the True Rate-Limiting Steps in Reducing Animal Research.

Journal of translational medicine·2026
Same author

Deep learning of CT imaging predicts PD-L1 expression and immunotherapy response in metastatic NSCLC: A multi-center study.

Cancer letters·2026
Same author

Machine Learning Assessment of Pathologic Response in Lung Cancer Resections After Neoadjuvant Therapy-IASLC MPR Project.

Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer·2026
Same author

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination Improved Survival in NSCLC Treated With Radiotherapy.

Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer·2026
Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

Comparing three regularization methods to avoid extreme allocation probability in response-adaptive randomization.

Yining Du1, John D Cook2, J Jack Lee3

  • 1a Department of Biostatistics , Incyte Corporation , Wilmington , Delaware , USA.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|March 22, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We compared three regularization methods for response-adaptive randomization (RAR). The power transformation (PT) and clip methods improved patient assignment to superior arms, while the burn-in method minimized trial variability.

Keywords:
Bayesian methodsclinical trial designearly stoppingoperating characteristics

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • Response-adaptive randomization (RAR) aims to assign more patients to effective treatments.
  • Regularization methods are crucial for balancing treatment allocation and statistical validity in RAR.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the operating characteristics of three regularization methods for RAR: power transformation (PT), clip, and burn-in.
  • To evaluate how these methods perform under different conditions, including the presence or absence of early stopping rules.

Main Methods:

  • Examined three RAR regularization methods: power transformation (PT), clip, and burn-in with equal randomization (ER) periods.
  • Varied tuning parameters to control the degree of adaptive randomization (AR) and achieve consistent statistical power.
  • Assessed performance based on patient allocation to the superior arm, overall response rate, statistical power, and trial variability.

Main Results:

  • Without early stopping, PT generally yielded higher proportions to the superior arm and better response rates, but with increased variability.
  • The burn-in method demonstrated the lowest variability among the three methods.
  • With efficacy early stopping, performance differences diminished, though PT and clip favored superior arm allocation and response rates, while burn-in required fewer patients.

Conclusions:

  • RAR methods can be tailored using regularization techniques (PT, clip, burn-in) to balance statistical power with improved patient outcomes.
  • The choice of method and tuning parameter significantly impacts trial efficiency and patient benefit.
  • Burn-in offers reduced variability and patient numbers, while PT and clip enhance treatment allocation and response rates, especially with early stopping rules.