Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 5, 2026

05:42
Detection and Removal of Tooth-Colored Composite Resin Using the Fluorescence-Aided Identification Technique
Published on: July 27, 2022
4.5K
Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinations
Bradford T Ulery1, R Austin Hicklin1, Maria Antonia Roberts2
1Noblis, Reston, VA, USA.
Forensic Science International
|March 22, 2017
Summary
This study examined factors influencing exclusion decisions in latent print examination. Key factors like image quality and examiner experience impact exclusion accuracy, aiding in error reduction and improved training.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Science
- Friction Ridge Analysis
Background:
- Exclusion, a critical determination in latent print examination, signifies that two friction ridge impressions do not share a common source.
- Existing literature predominantly focuses on individualization, with limited research on the factors influencing exclusion decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally assess the associations between various factors and exclusion determinations made by latent print examiners.
- To identify measurable factors that correlate with exclusion rates and the likelihood of erroneous exclusions.
Main Methods:
- An experimental study design was employed to analyze exclusion determinations.
- Data collected included image quality, examiner assessments, minutia counts, comparison difficulty, and the presence of specific friction ridge features (cores, deltas).
Main Results:
- Erroneous exclusions were found to be distributed across images and examiners, though more likely in certain scenarios.
- Factors significantly associated with exclusion rates included latent print quality, value determinations, minutia count, comparison difficulty, and the presence of cores or deltas.
Conclusions:
- Understanding the identified associations can elucidate circumstances contributing to errors and variations in reproducibility.
- The findings aim to enhance examiner training, casework quality assurance, and inform the broader community about the accuracy and reliability of exclusion decisions.
Related Concept Videos
IR Frequency Region: Fingerprint Region
2.1K
IR spectra are divided into two main regions: the diagnostic region and the fingerprint region. The diagnostic region of the spectrum lies above 1500 cm−1. The absorptions resulting from single-bond vibrations of the N–H, C–H, and O–H stretch at higher wavenumbers and appear on the left side of the spectrum. The stretching absorptions of the C≡C and C≡N occur between 2100–2300 cm−1. In contrast, those arising from stretching absorptions of the...
2.1K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
4.0K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
4.0K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
8.7K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.7K

