Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 5, 2026

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease
Federico Conrotto1, Stefano Salizzoni2, Alessandro Andreis1
1Division of Cardiology, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Insights
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) is linked to significantly higher mortality. Rigorous risk stratification is crucial for patients with stage 4 CKD undergoing TAVI.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is linked to adverse outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement.
- The prognostic impact of advanced CKD in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of patients with advanced CKD undergoing TAVI.
- To compare outcomes between different stages of advanced CKD (Stage 4 vs. Stage 5) in TAVI patients.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1,904 patients undergoing balloon-expandable TAVI from the Italian Transcatheter Balloon-Expandable Valve Implantation Registry (2007-2012).
- Advanced CKD defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate: Stage 4 (S4) 15-29 ml/min/1.73 m², Stage 5 (S5) <15 ml/min/1.73 m².
- Primary endpoint: all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints: major adverse cardiac events at 30 days and follow-up (VARC-2 criteria).
Main Results:
- 421 patients had advanced CKD (S4: n=347, S5: n=74).
- S5 patients had similar periprocedural and 30-day outcomes compared to S4 patients.
- During a mean follow-up of 670 days, S5 patients exhibited significantly higher all-cause mortality (69% vs. 39%, p<0.01) and cardiac death (19% vs. 9%, p=0.02) versus S4 patients.
- Independent predictors of death included male gender, LVEF <30%, atrial fibrillation, and S5 CKD (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.1).
Conclusions:
- TAVI in Stage 5 CKD patients (predialytic or dialytic) is independently associated with poor outcomes and a more than doubled risk of death compared to Stage 4 CKD.
- For patients with severe CKD (Stage 4), rigorous risk stratification is necessary to prevent futile interventions.
Abstract:
Advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with poor outcomes in patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement, whereas its prognostic role in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate outcomes in patients with advanced CKD who underwent TAVI. A total of 1,904 consecutive patients who underwent balloon-expandable TAVI in 33 centers between 2007 and 2012 were enrolled in the Italian Transcatheter Balloon-Expandable Valve Implantation Registry. Advanced CKD was defined according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate: 15 to 29 ml/min/1.73 m2 stage 4 (S4), <15 ml/min/1.73 m2 stage 5 (S5). Edwards Sapien or Sapien-XT prosthesis were used. The primary end point was all-cause mortality during follow-up. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiac events at 30 days and at follow-up, defined with Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 criteria. A total of 421 patients were staged S5 (n = 74) or S4 (n = 347). S5 patients were younger and had more frequently porcelain aorta and a lower incidence of previous stroke. Periprocedural and 30-day outcomes were similar in S5 and S4 patients. During 670 (±466) days of follow-up, S5 patients had higher mortality rates (69% vs 39%, p <0.01) and cardiac death (19% vs 9%, p = 0.02) compared with S4 patients. Male gender (hazard ratio [HR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 2.2), left ventricular ejection fraction <30% (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3 to 4), atrial fibrillation (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.9), and S5 CKD (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.1) were independent predictors of death. In conclusion, TAVI in predialytic or dialytic patients (i.e., S5) is independently associated with poor outcomes with more than double risk of death compared with patients with S4 renal function. Conversely, in severe CKD (i.e., S4) a rigorous risk stratification is required to avoid the risk of futility risk.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management

