Gastroscopy in patients with hiatal hernia with and without gastroesophageal mucosal prolapse

There are still many doubts in the literature regarding gastroesophageal mucosal prolapse (GEMP) and its clinical course. We still do not know what determines mucosal wedging in esophagogastric junction, and what is the role of the anatomy of that site. To investigate that problem we performed 120 upper digestive tract endoscopies in which a hiatal hernia was diagnosed. Patients referred to our unit with different complaints most frequently of typical or atypical gastroesophageal (GE) reflux symptoms. The aim of that study was to assess hernia dimensions in patients with and without GEMP diagnosed during endoscopy. Additionally we analyzed the type and prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms reported by patients to confirm the observation that GEMP symptoms differ from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms.

One-hundred and twenty patients were included in this study. All of the patients were diagnosed with a hiatal hernia during routine gastroscopy. Using standardized methodology the region of the hiatal hernia was photographed, and hernia longitudinal and transverse dimensions were measured.

The study group comprised 57 females (52.5%) and 63 males - mean age (SD) 58.5 ± 18.4. Most of the patients had standard GERD symptoms (n = 96; 80%). The average length of hiatus, in patients with GEMP (n = 24; 20%) was 3.56 ± 0.59 cm, and the average width was 2.32 ± 0.62 cm (n = 96; 80%) vs. 4.64 ± 0.74 cm and 2.98 ± 0.68 cm respectively in patients without GEMP (p <0.001).

GEMP occurs in smaller sized hiatal hernias. We confirmed that disease symptoms of the majority of patients with GEMP differ from patient with GERD but without GEMP. However this difference was not significant enough to allow to differentiate between diagnoses based solely on the symptoms.