Same Precursor, Two Different Products: Comparing the Structural Evolution of In-Ga-O "Gel-Derived" Powders and
Suzannah R Wood1, Keenan N Woods1, Paul N Plassmeyer1
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Material Science Institute, University of Oregon , Eugene, Oregon 97403, United States.
Journal of the American Chemical Society
|March 23, 2017
Summary
Indium gallium oxide thin films and powders show different structural evolution. Advanced X-ray scattering reveals amorphous β-Ga2O3 as a major phase, crucial for understanding amorphous metal oxide applications.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Solid State Chemistry
Background:
- Amorphous metal oxides are vital for technological uses, with indium gallium oxide being a key material for thin-film transistors.
- Understanding the structural properties of these materials is essential for optimizing their performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the structural evolution of indium gallium oxide gel-derived powders and thin films.
- To compare the structural differences between powders and films derived from the same precursor.
- To explore the utility of pair distribution function (PDF) analysis in characterizing amorphous phases.
Main Methods:
- Infrared vibrational spectroscopy
- X-ray diffraction (XRD)
- Pair distribution function (PDF) analysis of X-ray total scattering (including thin-film PDF - tfPDF)
Main Results:
- Gel-derived powders and films exhibit distinct temperature-dependent structural evolution.
- Both materials form mixtures of Ga-substituted In2O3 and In-substituted β-Ga2O3.
- Amorphous/nanocrystalline β-Ga2O3 is identified as the dominant phase, often undetectable by conventional XRD.
- tfPDF analysis successfully characterized the amorphous β-Ga2O3 phase, revealing its structural features.
Conclusions:
- The combination of Bragg diffraction and tfPDF offers a comprehensive structural analysis of metal oxide thin films.
- tfPDF analysis is a powerful tool for elucidating the structure of amorphous materials.
- Understanding these structural details is key to correlating processing conditions with structure-property relationships in indium gallium oxide.
Related Concept Videos
Molecular Weight of Step-Growth Polymers
2.9K
Step growth polymerization involves bi or multifunctional monomers. Bifunctional monomers react to form linear step growth polymers, whereas multifunctional monomers react to form non-linear or branched polymers.
As the step-growth polymerization involves step-wise condensation of monomers, the molecular weight also builds up eventually. Consequently, high molecular weight polymers are obtained at the late stages of the polymerization, where 99% of monomers have been consumed.
The extent of the...
As the step-growth polymerization involves step-wise condensation of monomers, the molecular weight also builds up eventually. Consequently, high molecular weight polymers are obtained at the late stages of the polymerization, where 99% of monomers have been consumed.
The extent of the...
2.9K
Polymers: Molecular Weight Distribution
5.0K
For any given polymer, the weight average molecular weight (Mw) is higher than, if not equal to, the number average molecular weight (Mn). The only situation in which the weight average molecular weight and the number average molecular weight are equal is when a polymer consists only of chains with equal molecular weight. However, this never happens in a synthetic polymer, since it is difficult to control the polymerization process up to a molecular level with accuracy to a hundred percent.
5.0K


