Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 5, 2026

Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation
Published on: October 15, 2021
Conservative Management of Large Traumatic Supratentorial Epidural Hematoma in the Pediatric Population
Pierre-Olivier Champagne1, Kevin Xiaho He, Claude Mercier
1Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Insights
Conservative management is safe for asymptomatic children with large traumatic epidural hematomas (TEH). This approach is effective even for voluminous TEH, with injury velocity potentially influencing outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurosurgery
- Trauma Management
- Neurological Surgery
Background:
- Conservative management of traumatic epidural hematomas (TEH) is increasingly accepted for asymptomatic children.
- Optimal maximal TEH size for non-surgical treatment remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of conservative management for voluminous traumatic epidural hematomas in children.
- To identify factors influencing the success of non-operative TEH treatment.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 16 children with traumatic epidural hematomas exceeding 15 mm thickness.
- All patients underwent conservative management with close clinical observation.
Main Results:
- Conservative management was successful in 14 patients (88%).
- Two patients (12%) required surgical intervention, both with high-velocity injury mechanisms.
- All patients achieved a favorable outcome with a Glasgow Outcome Scale of 5/5.
Conclusions:
- Conservative management is a safe and effective option for voluminous traumatic epidural hematomas in asymptomatic children.
- High-velocity injury mechanisms may be a predictor of conservative management failure in pediatric TEH.
Background/Aims:
Conservative management of traumatic epidural hematomas is being recognized as a safe alternative to surgical treatment in asymptomatic children. There is still debate about the maximal size of epidural hematoma that should be tolerated before deciding for surgery.
Methods:
We report - through a retrospective cohort study from a single institution - a series of 16 conservatively managed traumatic epidural hematomas of more than 15 mm thickness.
Results:
14 patients (88%) were successfully treated using conservative management. Two patients required surgery. These 2 patients had the only 2 documented high-velocity injury mechanisms. All patients had a Glasgow Outcome Scale of 5/5 on follow-up.
Conclusion:
Conservative management with close observation is a safe alternative even in this population of voluminous hematomas. Injury velocity may be a contributing factor for failure of conservative management in this population.

