Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models00:57

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models

402
Physiological pharmacokinetic models, often called flow-limited or perfusion models, typically assume a swift drug distribution between tissue and venous blood, creating a rapid drug equilibrium. This premise is based on the idea that drug diffusion is extremely fast, and the cell membrane presents no barrier to drug permeation. In this scenario, where no drug binding occurs, the drug concentration in the tissue equals that of the venous blood leaving the tissue. This greatly simplifies the...
402
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

1.2K
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
1.2K
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

301
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
301
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview01:27

Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview

54
Pharmacodynamic (PD) responses describe the interaction between a drug and its biological target, culminating in a physiological effect. These responses can be classified into different types: continuous variables, such as blood glucose levels; categorical outcomes, like survival rates; and time-to-event metrics, such as disease progression. Understanding and modeling PD responses are critical for optimizing drug efficacy and safety.PD models describe the relationship between drug concentration...
54
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

1.3K
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
1.3K
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model01:29

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

67
Pharmacodynamic models are essential tools in understanding the relationship between drug concentrations and their effects on biological systems. By characterizing the dynamics of drug action, these models guide dose selection, optimize therapeutic efficacy, and inform the development of new drugs. Two major classes of pharmacodynamic models include direct effect and indirect response models.Direct Effect ModelsDirect effect models describe the immediate relationship between drug concentration...
67

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rapid personalisation of cardiovascular models using invasively measured right ventricular pressure.

Computers in biology and medicine·2026
Same author

Mechanistic interpretations of sustained ventricular fibrillation: The role of mapping methodology, model and time.

Heart international·2026
Same author

Digital twins for cardiopulmonary medicine: the case for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2026
Same author

Role of beta-adrenergic modulation of action potential duration in arrhythmogenesis in Long QT Syndrome Type 1 & 2.

Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical·2026
Same author

Rapid calibration of atrial electrophysiology models using Gaussian process emulators in the ensemble Kalman filter.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

A Virtual Trial to Identify Cardiovascular Biomarkers for Differentiating Diabetic and Hypertensive Kidney Disease.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 5, 2026

Creating a Structurally Realistic Finite Element Geometric Model of a Cardiomyocyte to Study the Role of Cellular Architecture in Cardiomyocyte Systems Biology
08:54

Creating a Structurally Realistic Finite Element Geometric Model of a Cardiomyocyte to Study the Role of Cellular Architecture in Cardiomyocyte Systems Biology

Published on: April 18, 2018

10.2K

Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a 1D vascular model with Gaussian process emulators.

Alessandro Melis1,2, Richard H Clayton1,3, Alberto Marzo1,2

  • 1INSIGNEO Institute for in Silico Medicine, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K.

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
|March 25, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a faster method for analyzing cardiovascular models. Using Gaussian process emulators significantly reduces computational time for sensitivity analysis, enabling patient-specific vascular modeling.

Keywords:
1D vascular modelGaussian processSobolemulatorsensitivity analysis

More Related Videos

Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression
11:26

Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression

Published on: December 10, 2014

12.9K
Spatial Temporal Analysis of Fieldwise Flow in Microvasculature
09:39

Spatial Temporal Analysis of Fieldwise Flow in Microvasculature

Published on: November 18, 2019

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 5, 2026

Creating a Structurally Realistic Finite Element Geometric Model of a Cardiomyocyte to Study the Role of Cellular Architecture in Cardiomyocyte Systems Biology
08:54

Creating a Structurally Realistic Finite Element Geometric Model of a Cardiomyocyte to Study the Role of Cellular Architecture in Cardiomyocyte Systems Biology

Published on: April 18, 2018

10.2K
Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression
11:26

Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression

Published on: December 10, 2014

12.9K
Spatial Temporal Analysis of Fieldwise Flow in Microvasculature
09:39

Spatial Temporal Analysis of Fieldwise Flow in Microvasculature

Published on: November 18, 2019

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Cardiovascular research

Background:

  • One-dimensional cardiovascular models simulate pulse waves but require numerous parameters, hindering patient-specific applications.
  • Sensitivity analysis is crucial for understanding parameter influence and output uncertainty in these models.
  • Traditional Monte Carlo methods for sensitivity analysis are computationally intensive.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the computational efficiency of variance-based sensitivity analysis for 1D vascular models using Gaussian process emulators.
  • To compare this emulator-based approach against standard Monte Carlo methods.
  • To assess the scalability of the proposed methodology.

Main Methods:

  • Gaussian process emulators were employed for sensitivity analysis of 1D vascular models.
  • The methodology was tested on four vascular networks of increasing complexity.
  • Computational time and sensitivity indices were compared between the emulator and Monte Carlo approaches.

Main Results:

  • The Gaussian process emulator approach reduced computational time for sensitivity analysis by 99.96% compared to Monte Carlo.
  • Sensitivity indices obtained from both methods were comparable.
  • The number of simulations needed for emulator training scaled as O(d), significantly better than Monte Carlo's O(d×103).

Conclusions:

  • Gaussian process emulators offer a computationally efficient alternative for sensitivity analysis in 1D vascular models.
  • This approach facilitates the development of patient-specific cardiovascular models.
  • The method has the potential to yield clinically relevant results by quantifying parameter uncertainty impacts.