Treatment Rationale and Design for J-AXEL: A Randomized Phase 3 Study Comparing Nab-Paclitaxel With Docetaxel in

Yasuto Yoneshima1, Satoshi Morita2, Masahiko Ando3

  • 1Division of Respiratory Medicine, Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuoka, Japan; Research Institute for Diseases of the Chest, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Clinical Lung Cancer
|March 26, 2017
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

This phase 3 trial compares nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) to docetaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. It aims to establish nab-paclitaxel as a safe and effective alternative treatment option.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab) paclitaxel shows promise for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
  • Previous phase 2 studies indicated promising activity and acceptable toxicity of weekly nab-paclitaxel in advanced NSCLC.
  • A phase 3 study is designed to compare nab-paclitaxel with docetaxel in previously treated advanced NSCLC patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical benefit and safety of nab-paclitaxel compared to docetaxel.
  • To assess the noninferiority of nab-paclitaxel relative to docetaxel for overall survival.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized phase 3 intergroup study (J-AXEL).
  • Patients receive either docetaxel (60 mg/m² every 3 weeks) or nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 15 every 3 weeks).
  • Treatment continues until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Main Results:

  • The primary endpoint is to evaluate the noninferiority of nab-paclitaxel versus docetaxel for overall survival.

Conclusions:

  • If noninferiority is demonstrated, nab-paclitaxel will be established as a new alternative treatment option.
  • This study provides evidence for improved therapeutic options in previously treated advanced NSCLC.

Related Concept Videos