Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Myofascial pain and dysfunction as predictors of tinnitus in adults: a case-control study.

Head & face medicine·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence for skeletal classification in orthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of lateral cephalometric studies.

Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences·2026
Same author

Understanding the Content and Purpose of S3 Clinical Practice Guidelines in Dentistry.

International endodontic journal·2026
Same author

AI-assisted Software Development in Digital Dentistry: A Technical Innovation Report with Three Open-Source Applications.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

Predicting Perceived Profile Attractiveness From Cephalometric Measurements Using Machine Learning.

International dental journal·2026
Same author

Diagnosis and Dentists' Treatment Preferences for Vestibular Enamel Defects-A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 5, 2026

Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry
03:37

Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry

Published on: June 6, 2025

537

Cost-effectiveness of Different Post-retained Restorations.

Falk Schwendicke1, Michael Stolpe2

  • 1Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Journal of Endodontics
|March 28, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Preformed metal posts are the most cost-effective for dental restorations when no additional investment is desired. Glass fiber posts offer longer tooth retention for a slightly higher cost, making them a viable option for those willing to pay more.

Keywords:
Computer modellingMarkov modeldental carefiber postshealth economicsprosthetics

More Related Videos

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
07:42

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material

Published on: December 20, 2024

917
Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities
07:14

Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities

Published on: May 24, 2022

5.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 5, 2026

Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry
03:37

Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry

Published on: June 6, 2025

537
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
07:42

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material

Published on: December 20, 2024

917
Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities
07:14

Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities

Published on: May 24, 2022

5.3K

Area of Science:

  • Dental materials science
  • Health economics
  • Prosthodontics

Background:

  • Dentists select between metal and fiber post systems for post-retained restorations.
  • Different post systems present varying risks of tooth loss and complications, alongside differing initial treatment costs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of four post-retained restoration systems: cast metal (MC), preformed metal (MP), glass fiber (GF), and carbon fiber (CF).

Main Methods:

  • A mixed public-private payer perspective within the German healthcare system was adopted.
  • Systematic reviews provided data on complication risks; costs were based on 2016 fee items and material expenses.
  • A Markov model with Monte Carlo microsimulations assessed lifetime costs and tooth retention for a 50-year-old patient.

Main Results:

  • Preformed metal posts (MP) were least expensive (€692), retaining teeth for 26.7 years.
  • Glass fiber posts (GF) cost more (€745) but retained teeth longer (27.6 years).
  • Cast metal (MC) and carbon fiber (CF) posts were less cost-effective, with CF being the most expensive and least effective.

Conclusions:

  • MP is most suitable for payers prioritizing cost-effectiveness without additional investment.
  • GF posts are recommended for payers willing to invest more for longer tooth retention.
  • MC posts are cost-effective only at very high willingness to pay; CF posts are not recommended.