Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

447
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
447
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

553
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
553
McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

934
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
934
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

677
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
677
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.5K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.5K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

523
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
523

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Test-negative Designs with Various Reasons for Testing: Statistical Bias and Solution.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

The effects of a smoking cessation intervention on mortality after a 32.5-year follow-up period: a randomized clinical trial.

American journal of epidemiology·2025
Same author

Mapping the expression of endothelial adhesion receptors for Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes in fatal cerebral malaria in Malawian children.

Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology·2025
Same author

Peri-Rolandic and Occipital Sparing Cortical Edema: A Prevalent MRI Finding in Pediatric Patients with Cerebral Malaria.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2025
Same author

Identification and Inference with Invalid Instruments.

Annual review of statistics and its application·2025
Same author

What motivates participants: a qualitative analysis of gamification and financial incentives to increase physical activity.

BMC public health·2025
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 5, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.2K

Sensitivity analysis for matched pair analysis of binary data: From worst case to average case analysis.

Raiden Hasegawa1, Dylan Small1

  • 1Statistics Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 400 Jon M. Huntsman Hall, 3730 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6340, U.S.A.

Biometrics
|March 28, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method for sensitivity analysis in observational studies, calibrating it using average bias instead of worst-case bias. This approach offers a less conservative analysis with more power and a more natural interpretation for researchers.

Keywords:
Attributable effectsBinary dataCausal inferenceCellphoneMajorizationSensitivity analysisTraffic collision

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K
Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization
13:55

Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization

Published on: February 3, 2013

19.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 5, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.2K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K
Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization
13:55

Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization

Published on: February 3, 2013

19.1K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Observational Studies

Background:

  • Sensitivity analysis is crucial in observational studies to assess the impact of unmeasured confounders on treatment effect estimates.
  • The standard approach uses worst-case bias calibration, which can be overly conservative when worst-case bias is not consistently present.
  • A more nuanced calibration is needed for robust inference in non-randomized studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate an alternative calibration method for sensitivity analysis in matched observational studies using average bias.
  • To demonstrate the benefits of average bias calibration over worst-case bias calibration, including reduced conservatism and increased statistical power.
  • To extend the average bias calibration to confidence intervals for attributable effects.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel calibration approach for sensitivity analysis based on average bias for binary data in matched observational studies.
  • Compared the proposed average bias calibration with the standard worst-case bias calibration.
  • Applied the methodology to a real-world study examining cellphone use and automobile accidents.
  • Extended the average bias calibration to the analysis of confidence intervals for attributable effects.

Main Results:

  • The average bias calibration provides a less conservative sensitivity analysis compared to the worst-case bias method when these biases differ.
  • This approach increases statistical power, allowing for more sensitive detection of treatment effects.
  • The average bias calibration offers a more natural interpretation and facilitates the incorporation of empirical data for calibration.

Conclusions:

  • Average bias calibration is a valuable alternative to worst-case bias calibration for sensitivity analysis in matched observational studies.
  • This method enhances statistical power and interpretability, leading to more robust findings.
  • The proposed approach can be extended to confidence intervals for attributable effects, improving causal inference from observational data.