Cognitive control, dynamic salience, and the imperative toward computational accounts of neuromodulatory function
Christopher Michael Warren1, Peter Richard Murphy1, Sander Nieuwenhuis1
1Institute of Psychology and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition,Leiden University,2311 EZ,Leiden,The Netherlandsc.m.warren@fsw.leidenuniv.nlp.murphy@fsw.leidenuniv.nlsnieuwenhuis@fsw.leidenuniv.nlhttp://www.temporalattentionlab.com.
Abstract:
We draw attention to studies indicating that phasic arousal increases interference effects in tasks necessitating the recruitment of cognitive control. We suggest that arousal-biased competition models such as GANE (glutamate amplifies noradrenergic effects) may be able to explain these findings by taking into account dynamic, within-trial changes in the relative salience of task-relevant and task-irrelevant features. However, testing this hypothesis requires a computational model.
More Related Videos
09:14Exploring the Neural Correlates of Cognitive Reappraisal in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Task-based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: March 14, 2025
09:00Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex
Published on: April 15, 2015
Related Concept Videos
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Self-Regulation
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Cognitive Theories: Lazarus Mediational Theory of Emotion
Cognitive Appraisal and Emotional Response
Lazarus proposed that...
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
