Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.4K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.4K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

540
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
540
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.6K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.6K
Focusing of Light in the Eye01:16

Focusing of Light in the Eye

6.8K
Light rays enter the eye through the cornea, a transparent dome-shaped tissue that is the eye's outermost layer. The cornea bends or refracts, light rays traveling to the pupil. The shape of the cornea determines how much of the light is bent and whether the image will be focused correctly on the retina at the back of the eye. Once the light has passed through both refraction layers, it converges into a single focal point onto a small area. This is where photoreceptors start transforming...
6.8K
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

822
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...
822
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.2K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An Early Lexical Screening Tool for British English: Psychometric Properties and Clinical Utility.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2026
Same author

Exploring child engagement in a multi-robot tutor-peer learning scenario.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same author

Gloves Are Hands: How English and Italian Children Label Nouns and Predicates at 24 and 30 Months in a Picture-Naming Task.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Robots to the rescue: Robot discouragement reduces young adults' risk-taking.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Adaptation and Standardization of Two Arabic Communicative Development Inventories for Children Aged 8-30 Months and 30-48 Months in Egypt, Jordan, and Palestine.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same author

Maternal and Paternal Education on Italian Monolingual Toddlers' Language Skills.

Brain sciences·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 5, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Decreased attention to object size information in scale errors performers.

Beata J Grzyb1, Angelo Cangelosi2, Allegra Cattani2

  • 1Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, United Kingdom; Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Infant Behavior & Development
|March 29, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Children making scale errors, attempting impossible actions with miniature objects, show reduced attention to object size. This suggests perceptual, not just action-level, origins for these developmental errors.

Keywords:
Decreased attentionObject sizeScale errors

More Related Videos

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 5, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental psychology
  • Cognitive science
  • Child perception

Background:

  • Young children exhibit "scale errors," attempting impossible actions on miniature objects.
  • Previous theories suggest decreased attention to object size but lack empirical testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate attention to object size information in children who exhibit scale errors.
  • To determine if scale errors originate at the perceptual or action level.

Main Methods:

  • Two groups of children (18-25 months and 48-60 months) participated.
  • Children completed an action task to elicit scale errors and a looking task observing size changes.

Main Results:

  • Children performing scale errors in the action task showed less attention to size changes in the looking task.
  • This difference in attention was observed compared to children not performing scale errors.

Conclusions:

  • Scale errors in children may stem from perceptual-level attention deficits.
  • Findings challenge action-level explanations and highlight the role of perception in early development.