Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 5, 2026

06:42
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
12.3K
The concomitants of conspiracy concerns.
Daniel Freeman1, Richard P Bentall2
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK. daniel.freeman@psych.ox.ac.uk.
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
|March 30, 2017
Summary
Conspiracy thinking is linked to lower well-being, poorer social connections, and increased psychiatric risks. Understanding these correlates is crucial for public health and societal well-being.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Sociology
- Public Health
Background:
- Conspiracy worldviews can erode individual and societal well-being.
- Mistrust is a key component of conspiracy thinking.
- Empirical study is needed to understand conspiracy beliefs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify correlates of conspiracy thinking in a representative US sample.
- To investigate the association between conspiracy beliefs and various demographic, social, and health factors.
- To establish the prevalence of conspiracy beliefs in the adult population.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the US National Comorbidity Survey-Replication (NCS-R).
- Inclusion of 5645 participants who responded to a specific conspiracy belief item.
- Weighting of results to ensure representativeness of the US adult English-speaking household population.
Main Results:
- 26.7% of participants endorsed conspiracy beliefs.
- Conspiracy believers were more likely to be male, unmarried, less educated, lower income, outside the labor force, ethnic minorities, non-religious attendees, carrying weapons, and perceive lower social standing.
- Conspiracy believers exhibited lower physical/psychological well-being, higher suicidal ideation, weaker social networks, insecure attachment, difficult childhoods, and higher psychiatric disorder rates.
Conclusions:
- Conspiracy worldviews are associated with increased risks for adverse outcomes.
- Conspiracy thinking represents a cognitive style requiring further empirical investigation.
- Monitoring prevalence, causation, and propagation of conspiracy beliefs is essential.
Related Concept Videos
Cause and Effect
12.6K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.6K
Group Polarization
39.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
39.3K
Correspondence Bias
276
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
276
Correlations
36.8K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
36.8K
Correlation and Causation
43.6K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
43.6K
Confirmation Biases
8.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.5K

