Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 5, 2026

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
The systolic-diastolic difference in carotid stiffness is increased in type 2 diabetes: The Maastricht Study
Marja G J Veugen1, Ronald M A Henry, Thomas T van Sloten
1aDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre +bCARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht UniversitycHeart and Vascular CentredDepartment of RadiologyeDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre +fCAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary CaregDepartment of Epidemiology, Maastricht UniversityhDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Objective:
In type 2 diabetes (T2D), increased arterial stiffening results from accelerated arterial wall matrix remodeling. The associated structural alterations modify the pressure dependency of arterial stiffness, which can be quantified by the systolic-diastolic difference in carotid pulse wave velocity (δPWV). We evaluated the association between T2D and δPWV as marker for matrix remodeling and whether δPWV may contain additional information beyond carotid stiffness (cPWV).
Methods:
In 746 individuals from The Maastricht Study, 415 with normal glucose metabolism; 126 with prediabetes; and 205 with T2D, carotid pulse wave velocity (cPWV) and δPWV were determined by ultrasonography and tonometry. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to investigate associations of glucose metabolism status (with normal glucose metabolism as reference) with cPWV and δPWV, adjusting for age, sex, mean arterial pressure, prior cardiovascular disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate and smoking, and δPWV or cPWV as appropriate.
Results:
After adjustment for age, sex, mean arterial pressure, prior cardiovascular disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate and smoking, T2D was associated with greater cPWV [β (95% confidence interval) 0.376 (0.119; 0.632)] and δPWV [0.301 (0.013; 0.589)]. After additional adjustment for δPWV or cPWV, associations of T2D with cPWV and δPWV were attenuated [0.294 (0.048; 0.539) and 0.173 (-0.103; 0.449), respectively]. Prediabetes was not associated with either cPWV or δPWV.
Conclusion:
The systolic-diastolic difference in carotid stiffness is increased in T2D, but not prediabetes. Importantly, the association was not abolished by carotid stiffness, which suggests that systolic-diastolic difference in carotid stiffness carries additional information regarding arterial matrix remodeling.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:

