Evolutionary change of restriction cleavage sites and phylogenetic inference for man and apes

A mathematical theory for the evolutionary change of restriction endonuclease cleavage sites is developed, and the probabilities of various types of restriction-site changes are evaluated. A computer simulation is also conducted to study properties of the evolutionary change of restriction sites. These studies indicate that parsimony methods of constructing phylogenetic trees often make erroneous inferences about evolutionary changes of restriction sites unless the number of nucleotide substitutions per site is less than 0.01 for all branches of the tree. This introduces a systematic error in estimating the number of mutational changes for each branch and, consequently, in constructing phylogenetic trees. Therefore, parsimony methods should be used only in cases where nucleotide sequences are closely related. Reexamination of Ferris et al.'s data on restriction-site differences of mitochondrial DNAs does not support Templeton's conclusions regarding the phylogenetic tree for man and apes and the molecular clock hypothesis. Templeton's claim that Nei and Li's method of estimating the number of nucleotide substitutions per site is seriously affected by parallel losses and loss-gains of restriction sites is also unsupported.