Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reputational concerns as a general determinant of group functioning.

Nadira S Faber1, Julian Savulescu2, Paul A M Van Lange3

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology,University of Oxford,Oxford OX1 3UD,United Kingdomnadira.faber@psy.ox.ac.uknadirafaber.com.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|March 31, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical psychedelic research in adolescents: a scoping review and overview of ethical considerations.

The Lancet. Child & adolescent health·2025
Same author

Digital Doppelgängers, Human Relationships, and Practical Identity.

Bioethics·2025
Same author

Chat-IRB? How application-specific language models can enhance research ethics review.

Journal of medical ethics·2025
Same author

When to create embryos or organoids for research.

Journal of medical ethics·2025
Same author

Generative AI in healthcare education: How AI literacy gaps could compromise learning and patient safety.

Nurse education in practice·2025
Same author

Academic freedom, artificial intelligence and the blandification of ethics.

Journal of medical ethics·2025

Reputational concerns are key to understanding group functionality. Focusing on members' reputation drives prosocial behavior and information sharing in decision-making groups.

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Group Dynamics
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Group functionality is complex and influenced by various factors.
  • Understanding group (dys)functionality is crucial for optimizing collaborative efforts.
  • Existing theories may not fully capture the impact of individual member motivations on group outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a theoretical framework centered on reputational concerns for understanding group functionality.
  • To highlight the role of reputation in driving prosocial behavior and information exchange within groups.
  • To establish a theoretically robust and applicable model for analyzing group dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis and theoretical development.
  • Review of empirical evidence on group behavior.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Illustrative examples of prosocial behavior and information exchange in decision-making groups.

    • Main Results:

    • Reputational concerns significantly influence group functionality.
    • Empirical evidence supports the central role of reputation in group interactions.
    • The proposed conceptualization meets criteria for a strong scientific theory.

    Conclusions:

    • Focusing on members' reputational concerns offers a novel perspective on group (dys)functionality.
    • This theoretical approach enhances understanding, abstraction, testability, and applicability in group research.
    • Future research can leverage this framework to explore group dynamics more deeply.