Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Multilevel modeling of single-case data: A comparison of maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation
Mariola Moeyaert1, David Rindskopf2, Patrick Onghena3
1Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, University at Albany.
Bayesian estimation and maximum likelihood (ML) methods yield similar treatment effect estimates in single-case data. Variance estimates improve with more participants, and informative priors enhance precision, especially with small sample sizes.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Statistics
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) are crucial in behavioral research.
- Multilevel modeling (MLM) is increasingly used for analyzing SCED data.
- Bayesian estimation offers an alternative to traditional maximum likelihood (ML) methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe Bayesian estimation techniques for SCED data, including prior distribution construction.
- To compare parameter recovery between Bayesian and ML frameworks in multilevel SCED analyses.
- To evaluate the impact of prior informativeness on estimation accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Utilized multilevel modeling for single-case experimental data.
- Implemented Bayesian estimation with varying prior distributions (weakly informative and informative).
- Compared Bayesian results against maximum likelihood estimation.
Main Results:
- Bayesian and ML methods produced comparable treatment effect estimates.
- Both methods showed biased and imprecise variance estimates with small participant numbers (n=3).
- Increasing participants to 5 or 7 improved variance estimate precision for most methods.
- Informative priors in Bayesian analysis led to more precise fixed and random effect estimates, even with n=3.
Conclusions:
- Bayesian estimation is a viable alternative to ML for SCED data, particularly with informative priors.
- Sample size significantly impacts the precision of variance component estimates in multilevel SCED models.
- Careful prior specification in Bayesian analysis can mitigate issues related to small sample sizes.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

