Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

All-inside ACL reconstruction: How does it compare to standard ACL reconstruction techniques?

Alexander J Connaughton1, Andrew G Geeslin2, Christopher W Uggen2

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, 1000 Oakland Drive, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, United States.

Journal of Orthopaedics
|April 1, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiligament Knee Injuries.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same author

Surface Attachment Points for Lateral Extra-articular Procedures Are in Close Proximity to the Femoral and Tibial Physes in Skeletally Immature Patients.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2026
Same author

Recovery Stages After Multiligament Knee Reconstruction.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2025
Same author

Lateral Extra-articular Procedures With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: International Consensus.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2025
Same author

Reply to "Regarding 'Infograpic: Achilles Tendon Ruptures: Nonsurgical Versus Surgical Treatment'".

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2025
Same author

Posterior Tibial Slope Measurement With the Axis Estimate Method Is Not Inferior to the Established Proximal Anatomic Axis Method, and Both Differ From Cortical-Based Measurements.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2025

The all-inside anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction offers benefits like smaller incisions and less pain. However, studies show similar outcomes to standard techniques, with a potential for increased graft failure.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Sports Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is crucial for knee stability.
  • ACL reconstruction is a common orthopedic procedure.
  • The all-inside ACL reconstruction technique is an emerging alternative to traditional methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the all-inside ACL reconstruction technique with standard ACL reconstruction methods.
  • To evaluate biomechanical and clinical outcomes of both techniques.
  • To identify unique features and potential benefits or drawbacks of the all-inside approach.

Main Methods:

  • Review of biomechanical studies comparing all-inside and standard ACL reconstruction.
  • Analysis of clinical studies assessing subjective and objective outcomes.
Keywords:
AclAll-insideAnterior cruciate ligamentReconstruction

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of graft fixation methods, bone removal, incision size, and post-operative pain.

    • Main Results:

    • All-inside ACL reconstruction features closed-socket tunnels, dual suspensory fixation, reduced bone removal, and smaller incisions.
    • Similar subjective and objective outcomes were observed between all-inside and standard ACL techniques.
    • A potential association between the all-inside technique and decreased post-operative pain was noted.
    • A concern for a higher graft failure rate with the all-inside ACL technique was identified.

    Conclusions:

    • The all-inside ACL reconstruction presents a novel approach with potential advantages in surgical invasiveness.
    • Clinical outcomes appear comparable to standard techniques, but graft integrity requires further investigation.
    • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the long-term efficacy and safety profile of all-inside ACL reconstruction.