Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

P-value01:10

P-value

P-value is one of the most crucial concepts in statistics.
P-value stands for the probability value.  P-value is the probability that, if the null hypothesis is true, the results from another randomly selected sample will be as extreme or more extreme as the results obtained from the given sample.
A large P-value calculated from the data indicates to  not reject the null hypothesis. But a higher P-value does not mean that the null hypothesis is true. The smaller the P-value, the more unlikely...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Screenathon 2.0: human-AI collaborative screening applied to patient-generated health data.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Development and external validation of a short prognostic screening instrument for PTSD one year following individual civilian trauma.

European journal of psychotraumatology·2025
Same author

The hunt for the last relevant paper: blending the best of humans and AI.

European journal of psychotraumatology·2025
Same author

ASReview LAB v.2: Open-source text screening with multiple agents and a crowd of experts.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

PTSD course and predictors in a 15 year longitudinal cohort following suspected serious injury.

Npj mental health research·2025
Same author

A Bilingual Dataset for Testing Web Probing in the US and India: The Example of Measures of Environmental Concern.

Journal of open psychology data·2025
Same journal

Addressing selective reporting bias in meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes: A tutorial in R.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Heterogeneous variance models with Gaussian processes.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Bayesian evaluation for latent variable models: A tutorial on computing information criteria and bayes factors with the r package bleval.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A stochastic block prior for clustering in graphical models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Three-level vector autoregressive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Scaling cognitive modeling to big data: A deep learning approach to studying individual differences in evidence accumulation model parameters.

Psychological methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

Testing small variance priors using prior-posterior predictive p values.

Herbert Hoijtink1, Rens van de Schoot1

  • 1Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University.

Psychological Methods
|April 4, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method, the prior-posterior predictive p value, for evaluating structural equation models. This approach addresses limitations of existing methods when assessing approximate fit, offering a more robust alternative.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Dynamic Assessments of Coronary Flow Reserve after Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Mice
05:07

Dynamic Assessments of Coronary Flow Reserve after Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Mice

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Dynamic Assessments of Coronary Flow Reserve after Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Mice
05:07

Dynamic Assessments of Coronary Flow Reserve after Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Mice

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Psychometrics
  • Structural Equation Modeling

Background:

  • Traditional null-hypothesis testing in structural equation models (SEMs) can reject accurate models due to precise point null hypotheses.
  • Cohen's (1994) critique highlights that even minor, irrelevant deviations can lead to rejection of the null hypothesis.
  • Evaluating approximate fit using small variance priors is a development addressing these limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a new method for assessing model fit in SEMs using small variance priors.
  • To demonstrate the inadequacy of existing methods like posterior predictive p-value and DIC for evaluating small variance priors.
  • To propose the prior-posterior predictive p value as a suitable alternative.

Main Methods:

  • The study introduces the prior-posterior predictive p value as a novel statistical tool.
  • It elaborates on the distributions under null and alternative hypotheses for this new statistic.
  • The method is applied to practical examples, including testing differences between two means and the magnitude of correlations.

Main Results:

  • Existing methods such as posterior predictive p value and DIC are not suitable for evaluating models with small variance priors.
  • The proposed prior-posterior predictive p value is shown to be a well-behaving and consistent alternative.
  • The new method is demonstrated to be effective in practical applications.

Conclusions:

  • The prior-posterior predictive p value offers a statistically sound approach for evaluating approximate model fit in SEMs.
  • This method overcomes the limitations of traditional approaches when dealing with small variance priors.
  • It provides a reliable tool for researchers to assess the relevance of parameter differences from zero.