Related Experiment Videos
Proposal for a Novel Severity Grading System for Pterygia Based on Corneal Topographic Data
Kazunori Miyata1, Keiichiro Minami, Atsushi Otani
1*Miyata Eye Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan; †Kagoshima Miyata Eye Clinic, Kagoshima, Japan; ‡Tomey Corporation, Nagoya, Japan; and §Inouye Eye Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Cornea
|April 4, 2017
Summary
A new grading system for pterygium severity, based on corneal higher-order irregularity (HOI), effectively classifies pterygium stages. This system also evaluates the postoperative improvement in corneal irregularity after pterygium surgery.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Corneal topography
- Vision science
Background:
- Pterygium, a common eye condition, can cause visual impairment.
- Assessing pterygium severity often relies on subjective clinical grading.
- Objective measures of corneal irregularity are needed to complement existing assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel grading system for pterygium severity using corneal higher-order irregularity (HOI).
- To assess the effectiveness of this grading system in evaluating postoperative changes in corneal irregularity.
- To correlate pterygium grade with preoperative visual acuity and corneal surface regularity.
Main Methods:
- Corneal topography data from 268 eyes with primary nasal pterygium were analyzed before and up to 6 months after surgery.
- Fourier harmonic analysis was used to quantify HOI components within specific corneal diameters.
- A 4-level grading system (0-3) was developed based on threshold increases in HOI, with associations to surface regularity index (SRI), irregular components (IRR), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) examined.
Main Results:
- The proposed grading system included 62 (grade 0), 65 (grade 1), 41 (grade 2), and 100 (grade 3) eyes.
- Preoperative SRI, IRR, and BCVA significantly varied across the grades, with grade 3 showing the highest SRI.
- Postoperatively, grade 3 pterygia demonstrated significant changes in SRI and IRR between 1 and 6 months, unlike other grades.
Conclusions:
- The developed grading system effectively classifies pterygium severity based on objective corneal topographic data.
- The system allows for the evaluation of postoperative restoration of corneal irregularity.
- Corneal topographic analysis provides an objective method for assessing pterygium severity.