Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Identification of differentially expressed peptides in high-throughput proteomics data.

Michiel P van Ooijen1, Victor L Jong2, Marinus J C Eijkemans3

  • 1Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, CA Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Briefings in Bioinformatics
|April 4, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identification of CMTM6 and CMTM4 as PD-L1 protein regulators.

Nature·2017
Same author

Elucidating crosstalk mechanisms between phosphorylation and O-GlcNAcylation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2017
Same author

Natural products triptolide, celastrol, and withaferin A inhibit the chaperone activity of peroxiredoxin I.

Chemical science·2017
Same author

A community proposal to integrate proteomics activities in ELIXIR.

F1000Research·2017
Same author

3-Hydroxybenzoate 6-Hydroxylase from <i>Rhodococcus jostii</i> RHA1 Contains a Phosphatidylinositol Cofactor.

Frontiers in microbiology·2017
Same author

Erratum: Microtubule minus-end regulation at spindle poles by an ASPM-katanin complex.

Nature cell biology·2017

High-throughput proteomics requires robust statistical methods for peptide-level analysis. The empirical Bayes method (limma) offers the highest sensitivity for differential expression analysis, outperforming t-tests and ANOVA.

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • High-throughput proteomics generates vast datasets, challenging quantitative analysis.
  • Peptide-level analysis offers deeper insights into sub-protein variations like splice variants and post-translational modifications.
  • Current statistical methods (t-test, ANOVA) often rely on data imputation, with limited evaluation due to lack of gold standards.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate statistical methods for label-free, peptide-based differential proteomics data.
  • To assess the impact of data imputation on statistical analysis performance.
  • To determine optimal biological replicate numbers for reliable high-throughput data analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of four statistical analysis methods on experimental and resampled proteomics data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of data imputation techniques across varying numbers of biological replicates.
  • Performance assessment based on sensitivity and false discovery rates.

    • Main Results:

    • Three to four biological replicates are essential for confident identification of significant changes.
    • Data imputation can increase sensitivity but significantly elevates the false discovery rate.
    • The empirical Bayes method (limma) demonstrated superior sensitivity for peptide-level differential expression analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • Recommends the empirical Bayes method (limma) for peptide-level differential expression analysis in high-throughput proteomics.
    • Highlights the importance of sufficient biological replicates for robust statistical findings.
    • Warns of the increased false discovery rate associated with data imputation.