Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Clinical genetic testing in pediatric cardiomyopathy: Is bigger better?
A C Ouellette1, J Mathew2, A K Manickaraj1
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
For pediatric cardiomyopathy genetic testing, targeted gene panels show higher diagnostic yield than expanded (panCMP) panels. Expanded panels identified more variants of unknown significance (VUS) without increasing pathogenic variant detection.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Cardiology
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Clinical genetic testing for cardiomyopathy (CMP) lacks guidelines on optimal gene panel selection.
- Current options include phenotype-specific targeted panels versus expanded (panCMP) panels covering multiple CMP subtypes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical utility of targeted versus panCMP genetic panel testing in pediatric patients with cardiomyopathy.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 151 pediatric patients with hypertrophic, dilated, restrictive, or left-ventricular non-compaction CMP was analyzed.
- Clinical genetic panel testing data from targeted panels (n=104) and panCMP panels (n=47) were compared.
- Key metrics included yield of pathogenic variants and variants of unknown significance (VUS).
Main Results:
- Pathogenic variants were found in 26% of patients; 42% had VUS only, and 32% had negative results.
- Targeted panel testing yielded a higher rate of pathogenic variants (32%) compared to panCMP testing (15%) (P = .03).
- PanCMP panels detected significantly more VUS (87%) than targeted panels (30%) (P <.0001).
Conclusions:
- Expanded (panCMP) panel testing did not improve diagnostic yield for pediatric cardiomyopathy compared to targeted panels.
- Targeted gene panels may be sufficient for clinical genetic testing in pediatric CMP until panCMP variant interpretation improves.
Background:
For clinical genetic testing of cardiomyopathy (CMP), current guidelines do not address which gene panels to use: targeted panels specific to a CMP phenotype or expanded (panCMP) panels that include genes associated with multiple phenotypic subtypes.
Aim:
Our objective was to assess the clinical utility of targeted versus panCMP panel testing in pediatric CMPs.
Methods:
151 pediatric patients with primary hypertrophic (n = 66), dilated (n = 64), restrictive (n = 8), or left-ventricular non-compaction (n = 13) CMP who underwent clinical genetic panel testing at a single centre were included. PanCMP (n = 47) and targeted panel testing (n = 104) were compared for yield of pathogenic variants and variants of unknown significance (VUS).
Results:
Pathogenic variants were identified in 26% of patients, 42% had indeterminate results (only VUS detected), and 32% had negative results. Yield was lower (15%) in panCMP vs. targeted panel testing (32%) (P = .03) in all CMP subtypes. VUS detection was higher with panCMP (87%) than targeted panel testing (30%) (P <.0001). PanCMP panel testing only identified pathogenic variants in genes that overlapped targeted panels.
Conclusion:
PanCMP testing did not increase diagnostic yield compared to targeted panel testing. Until accuracy of variant interpretation with panCMP panels improves, targeted panels may be suitable for clinical testing in pediatric CMP.
More Related Videos
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
03:45Investigating the Pathogenesis of MYH7 Mutation Gly823Glu in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using a Mouse Model
Published on: August 8, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Karyotyping
Animal Mitochondrial Genetics
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy