Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2026

Testing Acetylcholine Followed by Adenosine for Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: February 3, 2021
Epicardial and microvascular coronary vasomotor dysfunction and its relation to myocardial ischemic burden in
Edoardo Verna1, Sergio Ghiringhelli2, Stefano Provasoli2
1Department of Cardiology, Ospedale di Circolo & Fondazione Macchi, University Hospital-Varese, Università dell'Insubria, Viale Borri 57, 21100, Varese, Italy. edoardo.verna@virgilio.it.
Insights
Epicardial endothelium-dependent dysfunction (EDD) significantly increases myocardial ischemia extent in non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) patients. Assessing both EDD and microvascular endothelium-independent dysfunction (EIMVD) is crucial for identifying patients with greater ischemic burden.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) presents diagnostic challenges for myocardial ischemia.
- Coronary vasomotor dysfunction, encompassing epicardial and microvascular components, is increasingly recognized in NOCAD.
- Understanding the distinct contributions of different types of coronary vasomotor dysfunction is essential for accurate ischemia assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the differential impact of epicardial endothelium-dependent dysfunction (EDD) and microvascular endothelium-independent dysfunction (EIMVD) on myocardial ischemia extent.
- To determine the relative contribution of EDD versus EIMVD in patients with NOCAD and ischemic symptoms.
Main Methods:
- Quantitative angiography and coronary blood flow (CBF) measurements using acetylcholine, nitroglycerine, and adenosine.
- Myocardial SPECT imaging to assess ischemic burden via summed stress (SSS) and summed ischemic (SDS) perfusion defect size.
- Analysis of vasomotion in 101 patients with suspected coronary artery disease and normal or non-obstructive coronary angiography.
Main Results:
- Coronary vasomotor dysfunction was prevalent (77%), with divergent EDD and EIMVD patterns in over half of affected patients.
- Epicardial endothelium-dependent dysfunction (EDD) was significantly associated with a greater myocardial ischemic burden (higher SDS and SSS) compared to EIMVD or normal vasomotion.
- Reduced acetylcholine-induced CBF correlated strongly with increased SDS and SSS, indicating functional impairment.
Conclusions:
- Vasomotor dysfunction is common in NOCAD patients presenting with ischemia.
- Epicardial endothelium-dependent dysfunction (EDD) is a more significant driver of myocardial ischemia extent than isolated microvascular endothelium-independent dysfunction (EIMVD).
- Comprehensive assessment of both EIMVD and EDD is necessary to elucidate ischemia mechanisms and identify patients at higher risk.
Aim:
To assess the relative contribution of epicardial endothelium-dependent (EDD) and microvascular endothelium-independent (EIMVD) coronary vasomotor dysfunction to the extent of myocardial ischemia in patients with normal angiograms or non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD).
Methods:
Coronary vasomotion was evaluated by quantitative angiography and blood flow (CBF) measurements during intracoronary acetylcholine, nitroglycerine, and adenosine in 101 patients. Myocardial SPECT ischemic burden was evaluated by semi-quantitative scoring of summed stress (SSS) and summed ischemic (SDS) perfusion defect size.
Results:
Coronary vasomotor dysfunction was found in most patients (83; 77%) with a divergent behavior of EDD and EIMVD in one half of them (52.4%). There was no significant difference in SDS between patients with and without EIMVD, whereas SDS was significantly greater in subjects with EDD as compared to patients with normal response to acetylcholine (4.31 ± 2.44 vs 1.35 ± 1.45; P < .0001). Patients with EDD, either alone or in combination with EIMVD, had significantly higher SSS as compared to patients with lone EIMVD or normal vasomotor function (8.50 ± 5.32; 5.55 ± 3.21; 2.60 ± 2.14; and 1.74 ± 1.66, respectively; P < .0001). Acetylcholine CBF correlated inversely with both SDS (r = -0.545; P < .001) and SSS (r = 0.538; P < .001).
Conclusions:
In NOCAD patients with symptoms and signs of myocardial ischemia, vasomotor dysfunction is common. EDD is associated with greater extent of ischemia as compared to isolated EIMVD. Thus, assessment of both EIMVD and EDD is needed to recognize mechanisms of ischemia and identify patients with greater ischemic burden.
More Related Videos
08:35Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac MRI with Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers for the Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Published on: August 17, 2022
08:21Intradermal Microdialysis: An Approach to Investigating Novel Mechanisms of Microvascular Dysfunction in Humans
Published on: July 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and narrowing...
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send blood...
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations