Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data?

Stephen F Weng1,2, Jenna Reps3,4, Joe Kai1,2

  • 1NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Plos One
|April 5, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical Features and Surgical Outcomes of Various Scleral Buckle Techniques in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

Journal of vitreoretinal diseases·2026
Same author

Improving the clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia among patients attending diabetes and cardiology clinics.

American journal of preventive cardiology·2026
Same author

The use of the electronic frailty index to optimise HbA1c targets in older individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Age and ageing·2026
Same author

Dyslipidaemia burden and population-specific lipid thresholds in rural Nigerian adults: Implications for cardiovascular risk screening.

Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD·2026
Same author

Mind the Gap: Human and AI Uncertainties in Cardiac MRI Segmentation.

Cardiovascular engineering and technology·2026
Same author

Risk factors for long-term cardiovascular post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 infection: A nested case-control study in Hong Kong.

NPJ cardiovascular health·2026
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Machine learning algorithms significantly improve cardiovascular risk prediction accuracy. These advanced models identify more individuals who need preventive treatment, while also reducing unnecessary interventions for others.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Current cardiovascular risk prediction models inadequately identify individuals for preventive treatment.
  • Existing methods lead to both missed opportunities for intervention and unnecessary treatments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy of machine learning algorithms in enhancing cardiovascular risk prediction accuracy.
  • To compare the predictive performance of machine learning models against established guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective cohort study of 378,256 UK patients without prior cardiovascular disease.
  • Four machine learning algorithms (random forest, logistic regression, gradient boosting, neural networks) were evaluated.
  • Comparison against the American College of Cardiology guidelines for 10-year cardiovascular event prediction.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Machine learning algorithms demonstrated improved predictive accuracy over the established algorithm (AUC 0.728).
  • Neural networks achieved the highest accuracy (AUC 0.764), showing a 3.6% improvement.
  • The best machine learning model correctly identified 7.6% more patients with cardiovascular disease compared to the standard method.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning significantly enhances the accuracy of cardiovascular risk prediction.
  • Improved prediction allows for better identification of patients who will benefit from preventive therapies.
  • These methods help to optimize treatment decisions, reducing both under- and over-treatment.