Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ultrasound Artifacts - Part 2.

Jörg A Bönhof

    Ultraschall in Der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)
    |April 5, 2017
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study explains ultrasound artifacts like shadows and enhancement, revealing they stem from sound attenuation and equipment settings, not just echo reflection. Understanding these factors improves diagnostic imaging accuracy.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Artifacts in Sonography - Part 3.

    Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)·2018
    Same author

    Von Meyenburg complexes: a rare cause for multiple hepatic lesions on transabdominal ultrasound.

    Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU·2012
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Ultrasound Technology
    • Diagnostic Radiology

    Background:

    • Ultrasound artifacts can mimic or obscure true pathology.
    • Previous discussions (Part 1) introduced common artifacts.
    • Understanding artifact origins is crucial for accurate interpretation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To elucidate the underlying mechanisms of specific ultrasound artifacts.
    • To differentiate artifact causes from intrinsic tissue properties.
    • To highlight the role of equipment and physics in artifact generation.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of ultrasound physics principles, including sound attenuation and reflection.
    • Examination of depth gain compensation and its influence on image appearance.
    • Investigation of anisotropy and its relation to relative echo strength.
    • Evaluation of image processing algorithms and their artifactual outputs.
    • Assessment of sound velocity deviations and their impact on spatial positioning and refraction.

    Main Results:

    • Shadows and acoustic enhancement are primarily linked to regional sound attenuation and depth gain compensation, not solely echo strength.
    • Anisotropy demonstrates that echo intensity is relative and equipment-dependent.
    • Image sharpening algorithms can introduce artifacts, such as black lines.
    • Deviations in sound velocity cause misregistration on the x-axis and/or refraction-induced misregistration on the y- and z-axes, contributing to shadows and enhancement.

    Conclusions:

    • Ultrasound artifact formation is complex, involving interactions between tissue properties, sound physics, and equipment parameters.
    • Accurate interpretation requires recognizing that echo strength is relative and influenced by gain settings.
    • Understanding these principles is essential for minimizing misinterpretations and improving diagnostic confidence in ultrasound imaging.

    Related Experiment Videos