International Working Group consensus response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017)

A Younes1, P Hilden2, B Coiffier3

  • 1Lymphoma Service.

Insights

New RECIL 2017 criteria simplify lymphoma response assessment using single-dimension measurements, similar to solid tumor RECIST criteria. This aids clinical trials with novel therapies and diverse patient populations.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Radiology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Increasing novel agents for lymphoma treatment necessitate updated clinical trial evaluation methods.
  • Current lymphoma response criteria (Lugano) differ from solid tumor criteria (RECIST), complicating multi-tumor trial assessments.
  • Advancements in genomic sequencing enable basket trials, requiring unified response assessment across malignancies.

Framework:

  • Hypothesized that single-dimension measurements, like RECIST, could effectively assess lymphoma treatment response.
  • Developed the RECIL 2017 criteria based on analysis of extensive imaging data from lymphoma patients.
  • Introduced a provisional 'minor response' category for nuanced treatment evaluation.

Implementation:

  • Analyzed 47,828 imaging measurements from 2983 adult and pediatric lymphoma patients across 10 multicenter trials.
  • Validated the use of the sum of longest diameters for up to three target lesions to assess tumor burden.
  • Clarified response assessment for unique imaging findings in patients on novel immunotherapies and targeted agents.

Implications:

  • RECIL 2017 offers a standardized, potentially more efficient method for lymphoma response assessment in clinical trials.
  • The criteria facilitate comparison across different tumor types and treatment modalities, including novel agents.
  • Improved response assessment can accelerate drug development and optimize patient care in lymphoma treatment.

Related Concept Videos