Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Eliciting interval beliefs: An experimental study.

Ronald Peeters1, Leonard Wolk2

  • 1Department of Economics, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Plos One
|April 6, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and validation of a novel patient-specific 3D-printed head and neck immobilization device for radiotherapy.

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Integrating functional network topology, synaptic density, and tau pathology to predict cognitive decline in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Evaluating the T1w/FLAIR ratio as a proxy for myelin: Associations with myelin water Imaging, diffusion metrics, and cognition.

Neuroradiology·2026
Same author

A comparison of fMRI presurgical mapping techniques with intraoperative brain mapping-based validation.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Induced zero-phase synchronization as a potential neural code for optimized visuomotor integration.

Brain stimulation·2025
Same author

Are resting-state network alterations in late-life depression related to synaptic density? Findings of a combined 11C-UCB-J PET and fMRI study.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same journal

Thymidylate synthase inhibitory drugs induce p53-dependent pathways differently.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Top-down and bottom-up attention for joint pattern classification and reconstruction.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Short- and long-term scaling behavior of blood pressure and pulse arrival time during sleep in healthy controls and patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Double DQN-based secrecy energy efficiency and fairness performance in IRS-assisted NOMA systems with friendly jamming.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

10 recommendations for strengthening citizen science for improved societal and ecological outcomes: A co-produced analysis of challenges and opportunities in the 21st century.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Paying in public: Peer effects, impression management, and willingness to pay on digital payment platforms.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

This study on interval scoring rules found that lower process volatility improves belief elicitation. Participants better optimized interval placement and length under low uncertainty, showcasing learning effects in forecasting.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Decision Science
  • Time Series Analysis

Background:

  • Subjective beliefs are crucial for decision-making under uncertainty.
  • Eliciting accurate subjective beliefs is challenging, especially with complex data.
  • The interval scoring rule offers a method for quantifying belief accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effectiveness of the interval scoring rule in eliciting subjective beliefs.
  • To examine how varying degrees of uncertainty (process volatility) impact belief elicitation accuracy.
  • To analyze learning dynamics in forecasting termination times of stochastic processes.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental design with two treatments: high and low volatility stochastic processes.
  • Subjects forecasted the termination time of time series, gradually learning the underlying process.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized the interval scoring rule to measure the accuracy of elicited subjective beliefs.

    • Main Results:

    • Elicited belief intervals were significantly more accurate under low volatility conditions.
    • Participants learned to optimally position their forecast intervals in the low volatility treatment.
    • In high volatility, participants optimized interval placement but not interval length.

    Conclusions:

    • The interval scoring rule is more effective for belief elicitation when uncertainty is low.
    • Learning improves forecast interval optimization, but optimal length remains a challenge in high volatility.
    • Findings have implications for understanding human judgment and forecasting in uncertain environments.