Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Comparative effects of the restriction method in two large observational studies of body mass index and mortality
Katherine M Flegal1, Barry I Graubard2, Sang-Wook Yi3
1Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Background:
A method applied in some large studies of weight and mortality is to begin with a well-defined analytic cohort and use successive restrictions to control for methodologic bias and arrive at final analytic results.
Materials And Methods:
Two observational studies of body mass index and mortality allow a comparative assessment of these restrictions in very large data sets. One was a meta-analysis of individual participant data with a sample size of 8 million. The second was a study of a South Korean cohort with a sample size of 12 million. Both presented results for participants without pre-existing disease before and after restricting the sample to never-smokers and deleting the first 5 years of follow-up.
Results:
Initial results from both studies were generally similar, with hazard ratios (HRs) below 1 for overweight and above 1 for underweight and obesity. The meta-analysis showed higher HRs for overweight and obesity after the restrictions, including a change in the direction of the HR for overweight from 0·99 (95% CI: 0·98-1·01) to 1·11 (95% CI: 1·10, 1·11). The South Korean data showed little effect of the restrictions and the HR for overweight changed from 0·85 (95% CI: 0·84-0·86) to 0·91 (95% CI: 0·90, 0·91). The summary effect size for overweight was 0·90 (95% CI: 0·89-0·91) before restrictions and 1·02 (95% CI: 1·02, 1·03) after restrictions.
Conclusions:
The effect of the restrictions is not consistent across studies, weakening the argument that analyses without such restrictions lack validity.
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Regression Toward the Mean
Obesity
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

