Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The sensitivity argument against child euthanasia.

Geoff Keeling

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |April 7, 2017
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    LLMs achieve adult human performance on higher-order theory of mind tasks.

    Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
    Same author

    We need a new ethics for a world of AI agents.

    Nature·2025
    Same author

    Health equity assessment of machine learning performance (HEAL): a framework and dermatology AI model case study.

    EClinicalMedicine·2024
    Same author

    Enabling Fairness in Healthcare Through Machine Learning.

    Ethics and information technology·2022
    Same author

    On Algorithmic Fairness in Medical Practice.

    Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2022
    Same author

    Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles.

    Science and engineering ethics·2019
    Same journal

    Ethics briefing.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Medical ethics and categorisation.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    See all related articles

    This study examines the moral distinctions between euthanasia for terminally ill adults and children. It argues that the sensitivity argument against moral differences is more convincing than previously suggested.

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Medical Ethics
    • Philosophy of Medicine

    Background:

    • The moral permissibility of euthanasia is a complex issue, particularly when considering different patient populations.
    • Luc Bovens previously analyzed arguments concerning moral differences between adult and child euthanasia, finding them unsuccessful.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To re-evaluate the moral distinctions between euthanasia for terminally ill adults and terminally ill children.
    • To specifically challenge Luc Bovens' dismissal of the sensitivity argument.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical argumentation and ethical analysis.
    • Critique of existing arguments in bioethics literature.

    Main Results:

    • The paper contends that Bovens' rejection of the sensitivity argument is unconvincing.
    Keywords:
    Clinical EthicsEuthanasiaPalliative Care

    Related Experiment Videos

  • It suggests that the sensitivity argument may indeed highlight a moral difference.

    • Conclusions:

    • There may be a morally relevant distinction between euthanasia for terminally ill adults and children, contrary to Bovens' claims.
    • The sensitivity argument warrants further consideration in bioethical debates on pediatric euthanasia.