Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

A Syngeneic Mouse Model of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma for Quantitative and Longitudinal Assessment of Preclinical Therapies
Published on: April 12, 2017
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced renal cell carcinoma: experience to date and future directions
M B Atkins1, J I Clark2, D I Quinn3
1Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC.
Abstract:
In recent years, there has been dramatic expansion of the treatment armamentarium for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), including drugs targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways. Despite these advances, patient outcomes remain suboptimal, underscoring the need for therapeutic interventions with novel mechanisms of action. The advent of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has led to significant changes in the treatment landscape for several solid malignancies. Specifically, drugs targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen (CTLA-4) pathways have demonstrated considerable clinical efficacy and gained regulatory approval as single-agent or combination therapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, aRCC, advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, urothelial cancer and Hodgkin lymphoma. In aRCC, the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab was approved in both the United States and Europe for the treatment of patients who have received prior therapy, based on improved overall survival compared with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus. Other checkpoint inhibitors, including the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab in combination with several agents, and the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab, are in various stages of clinical development in patients with aRCC. In this review, current evidence related to the clinical use of checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of patients with aRCC is discussed, including information on the frequency and management of unconventional responses and the management of immune-related adverse events. In addition, perspectives on the future use of checkpoint inhibitors are discussed, including the potential value of treatment beyond progression, the potential use in earlier lines of care or in combination with other agents, and the identification of biomarkers to guide patient selection and enable individualization of therapy.
Insights
Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors, like PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockers, offers new hope for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) patients. This review covers their use, side effects, and future potential in aRCC treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Renal Cell Carcinoma Research
Background:
- Advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) treatment has expanded with targeted therapies, but outcomes remain suboptimal.
- Immunotherapy, particularly checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen (CTLA-4) pathways, has transformed cancer treatment.
- These inhibitors are approved for various cancers, including aRCC, offering new therapeutic avenues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current evidence on checkpoint inhibitor use in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC).
- To discuss the management of unique responses and immune-related adverse events associated with these therapies.
- To explore future perspectives, including treatment beyond progression, earlier line use, combination therapies, and biomarker identification for personalized treatment.
Main Methods:
- Review of current clinical evidence on checkpoint inhibitors in aRCC.
- Discussion of clinical trial data for PD-1, CTLA-4, and PD-L1 inhibitors.
- Analysis of management strategies for immune-related adverse events and unconventional responses.
Main Results:
- Nivolumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) is approved for previously treated aRCC patients, showing improved survival over everolimus.
- Other checkpoint inhibitors like ipilimumab (CTLA-4) and atezolizumab (PD-L1) are in development.
- Checkpoint inhibitors demonstrate clinical efficacy in aRCC, necessitating careful management of side effects.
Conclusions:
- Checkpoint inhibitors represent a significant advancement in aRCC treatment.
- Effective management of immune-related adverse events and understanding unconventional responses are crucial.
- Future research should focus on optimizing treatment strategies, including combinations, earlier use, and biomarker-driven patient selection for personalized therapy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Tumor Immunotherapy

