Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Causal superlearning arising from interactions among cues.

Kouji Urushihara1, Ralph R Miller2

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Learning and Cognition
|April 7, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the generality of behavioral theory and abstract phenomena.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2026
Same author

Comparisons of extinction, counterconditioning, and novelty-facilitated extinction within ABA vs. ABC renewal designs.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same author

Rethinking memory impairments: Retrieval failure.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Contextual modulation of human associative learning following novelty-facilitated extinction, counterconditioning, and conventional extinction.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2024
Same author

Cue duration and trial spacing effects in contingency assessment in the streaming procedure with humans.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2024
Same author

Associative interference and nonreinforcement in human contingency learning.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023
Same journal

Time does the teaching.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same journal

Language learning in canines and toddlers: Shared origins?

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of outcome affective value in driving human Pavlovian learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crashing the tea party: Imagining alternative explanations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same journal

Static outcomes: Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation at Fp3 or P3 does not modulate perceptual learning as indexed by the intermixed-blocked effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same journal

A method for visual psychophysics based on the navigational behavior of desert ants (Melophorus bagoti).

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study explores causal superlearning in humans, a phenomenon similar to superconditioning. Findings reveal its sensitivity to experimental conditions and challenge existing learning theories.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Learning Theory
  • Human Behavior

Background:

  • Superconditioning involves enhanced responses to a conditioned stimulus (CS) when paired with an unconditioned stimulus (US) alongside a conditioned inhibitor.
  • Causal superlearning is a human learning phenomenon analogous to superconditioning, investigated here within human causal learning contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate causal superlearning, a phenomenon analogous to superconditioning in human causal learning.
  • To examine factors influencing causal superlearning, including the number of cues and timing of testing.
  • To evaluate the explanatory power of associative learning models versus propositional reasoning accounts.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted to investigate causal superlearning in human participants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experimental designs manipulated the number of cues, employed control conditions, and varied testing immediacy.
  • Cue ratings were collected to assess the strength of learned associations and inhibitory relationships.

    • Main Results:

    • Causal superlearning was demonstrated under appropriate control conditions.
    • Superlearning diminished with a larger number of cues but persisted with immediate post-training testing.
    • Ratings for the superlearning cue were weaker than for the training excitor, supporting an associative model over propositional reasoning.

    Conclusions:

    • Causal superlearning is influenced by the complexity of the learning environment (number of cues) and temporal factors.
    • Immediate testing can reveal superlearning even in complex cue environments, posing challenges for current learning theories.
    • While associative models offer a better explanation for some findings, both associative and propositional reasoning models show limitations in fully explaining causal superlearning.