Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2026

Urinary Tract Infection in a Small Animal Model: Transurethral Catheterization of Male and Female Mice
Published on: December 1, 2017
Pitfalls of diagnosing urinary tract infection in infants and young children
Yasuhito Yamasaki1, Osamu Uemura1, Takuhito Nagai1
1Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center, Obu, Aichi, Japan.
Insights
Diagnosing urinary tract infections (UTIs) using pyuria in catheterized urine is reliable, but pyuria in bag-collected samples is less accurate, especially in girls. This impacts UTI diagnosis in children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common pediatric infections.
- Accurate diagnosis of UTI is crucial for timely treatment.
- Pyuria, the presence of white blood cells in urine, is a key indicator for UTI diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of pyuria for UTI detection in urine collected via transurethral catheterization.
- To assess the reliability of pyuria diagnosis in urine samples collected using a perineal bag.
- To compare the UTI diagnostic performance between different urine collection methods.
Main Methods:
- A study involving 301 patients with suspected UTI between 2005 and 2009.
- Collection of 438 urine samples using transurethral catheterization.
- Analysis of pyuria in both catheterized and bag-collected urine specimens to determine UTI diagnostic accuracy.
Main Results:
- The false-negative rate for UTI diagnosis based on pyuria in catheterized urine was 9.0%.
- Approximately 28% of pyuria-positive bag-collected samples were pyuria-negative by catheterization.
- This discrepancy was significantly higher in girls (56.7%) compared to boys (8.9%).
Conclusions:
- Absence of pyuria in catheterized urine does not exclude a UTI diagnosis.
- Pyuria in bag-collected urine may include leukocytes from external genitalia, affecting diagnostic reliability.
- Transurethral catheterization provides a more accurate assessment of pyuria for UTI diagnosis than bag collection, particularly in differentiating true infection from contamination.
Background:
The aim of this study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of pyuria-based diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in urine collected by transurethral catheterization, and the reliability of diagnosis of pyuria in urine collected in a perineal bag. The gold standard for UTI diagnosis is significant colony counts of a single organism in urine obtained in a sterile manner.
Methods:
We enrolled 301 patients who underwent medical examination at the present hospital for possible UTI between January 2005 and December 2009. We collected 438 urine samples by transurethral catheterization. We investigated the accuracy of pyuria-based diagnosis of UTI using transurethral catheterization urine specimens, and the reliability of diagnosis of pyuria using bag-collected urine specimens.
Results:
The false-negative rate of UTI diagnosis based on pyuria in transurethral catheterization urine sediments was 9.0%; there was no significant difference in the false-negative rate of UTI diagnosis between boys and girls. Approximately 28% of pyuria-positive bag-collected urine specimens were pyuria negative on transurethral catheterization; this rate was significantly higher in girls than in boys (56.7% vs. 8.9%, P < 0.0001).
Conclusions:
The absence of pyuria in transurethral catheterization urine sediments does not rule out UTI. Pyuria in bag-collected urine specimens frequently consists of urine leukocytes from external genitalia as well as from the urinary tract.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Infection I: Introduction
Urinary Tract Infection II: Pathophysiology
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management
Urinary Tract Calculi II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test

