Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026
Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Circulation
Published on: September 18, 2012
Usability and reproducibility of tear meniscus values generated via swept-source optical coherence tomography and the
Hitoshi Imamura1,2, Hitoshi Tabuchi3, Shunsuke Nakakura3
1Department of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1, Aboshi Waku, Himeji, 671-1227, Japan. h.imamura@tsukazaki-eye.net.
Purpose:
To investigate the usability and the reproducibility of the tear meniscus values via swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and the conventional slit lamp microscope method with a graticule.
Methods:
The right eye was examined in 90 healthy adult subjects who were grouped according to age (group 1: 20-39 years; group 2: 40-59 years; group 3: ≥60 years). The tear meniscus height (TMH) and tear meniscus area were measured using SS-OCT and TMH by the slit lamp microscope method. The reproducibility of each method was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) in additionally enrolled 30 healthy young subjects. We also evaluated TMH at 3 mm from the corneal center in both temporal and nasal directions using SS-OCT.
Results:
The mean of the TMH values measured by SS-OCT was significantly higher than those measured by the slit lamp method (328 vs. 212 μm, P < 0.001, respectively). High reproducibility was observed for each method (ICC > 0.75 for both). No statistically significant differences were found in TMH among the age groups using both SS-OCT and slit lamp methods (P = 0.985, 0.380, respectively). TMH values at both sides of the corneal center were significantly smaller than those at the corneal center (P < 0.0001).
Conclusions:
TMH values obtained by the slit lamp method were lower than those obtained by SS-OCT. However, both methods yielded highly reproducible TMH measurements, suggesting that they are clinically useful. Tear meniscus values did not vary by age but by measurement points in our cohort.
