Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
Adler's Individual Psychology01:28

Adler's Individual Psychology

Alfred Adler, a prominent figure in psychology, founded the school of individual psychology. In contrast to Freud's emphasis on sexual or aggressive motives, Adler suggested that individuals are primarily motivated by their purposes and goals. He believed that people strive for perfection rather than pleasure. Adler argued that individuals could creatively act upon their genetic inheritance and environmental experiences to shape their own lives, emphasizing conscious motivation over unconscious...
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity01:23

Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity

Adolescence is a pivotal period of identity formation, during which individuals begin to answer questions central to their sense of self, such as "Who am I?" and "Who do I hope to become?" Both parents and peers play critical roles in guiding adolescents through this complex developmental phase.
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity01:22

Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity

Proximity plays a fundamental role in shaping interpersonal attraction by increasing opportunities for interaction and fostering familiarity. Research consistently demonstrates that individuals are more likely to form social bonds with those who are physically closer to them, whether in residential settings, workplaces, or educational institutions. This effect is largely driven by the increased frequency of encounters, which facilitates the development of friendships and romantic...
Friendships and Close Friendships01:20

Friendships and Close Friendships

Friendship formation is a dynamic process shaped by psychological, cultural, and social factors. Friendships play a crucial role in emotional well-being, social development, and personal identity from childhood to adulthood.Childhood and Early FriendshipsFriendships in childhood often arise due to shared environments, such as school or neighborhood interactions. At this stage, proximity and common interests serve as the primary basis for connection. As children grow, their friendships evolve...
Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings01:29

Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings

Other adult family members and siblings play a crucial role in shaping children’s social and emotional development. While parents or primary caregivers are often the central figures in early attachment and socialization, other adults in a child’s life, such as grandparents, aunts, and uncles, can significantly influence developmental outcomes. These influences depend on each adult’s personality and may help compensate when a primary caregiver is emotionally distant or inconsistent. For...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From peers to partners: The peer-context origins of adolescent heterosexual romance.

Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence·2026
Same author

On risks and rewards: A longitudinal network analysis of defending and popularity in late childhood.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same author

Different peers influence different behaviors: Conformity to best friends and status-based norms across the transition into adolescence.

Development and psychopathology·2026
Same author

The role of defenders' and victims' popularity in the effectiveness of defending in bullying interactions: A longitudinal social network study.

Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence·2025
Same author

Interpersonal Style and Depression Symptoms in Victims of Bullying: A Longitudinal Study Across the Transition Out of Dutch High School.

Journal of interpersonal violence·2025
Same author

A feasibility study of a preventative, transdiagnostic intervention for mental health problems in adolescence: building resilience through socioemotional training (ReSET).

Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

First selection, then influence: Developmental differences in friendship dynamics regarding academic achievement.

Mariola Claudia Gremmen1, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra1, Christian Steglich1

  • 1Department of Sociology, University of Groningen.

Developmental Psychology
|April 11, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Adolescents initially select friends with similar academic grades. Over time, especially in the second year of secondary school, peer influence causes their grades to become more alike.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Chronic Social Defeat Stress in Early Adolescent Male Mice
07:06

Chronic Social Defeat Stress in Early Adolescent Male Mice

Published on: January 24, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Chronic Social Defeat Stress in Early Adolescent Male Mice
07:06

Chronic Social Defeat Stress in Early Adolescent Male Mice

Published on: January 24, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • Peer relationships significantly impact adolescent academic trajectories.
  • Understanding selection and influence dynamics is crucial for academic development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate peer selection and influence on academic achievement in early adolescents.
  • To examine developmental differences in these processes across school years.
  • To differentiate effects on average versus cluster-specific grades.

Main Methods:

  • Longitudinal social network analysis (RSiena) was employed.
  • Data collected from 6 waves of the SNARE study (N = 601).
  • Analysis focused on average and cluster-specific grades (language, exact, social).

Main Results:

  • Selection processes dominated in the first year, with friends chosen based on similar cluster-specific grades.
  • Influence processes emerged in the second year, affecting both average and cluster-specific grades.
  • Low-achieving students actively sought similar peers, while high-achievers tended to avoid them.

Conclusions:

  • Academic peer dynamics evolve developmentally, differing between the first and second year of secondary school.
  • Initial friend selection is based on academic similarity, shifting to mutual influence over time.
  • Specific school subjects and developmental stages are critical factors in adolescent academic peer influence.