[Application of the method of anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for distal clavicle fractures]

Objective: To assess the clinical results of the method of anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for distal clavicle fractures. Methods: From August 2013 to January 2015, the super image system was used to measure the CT data of 16 patients suffering distal clavicle fractures before operation in Department of Orthopaedics , the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical Univerisity. The fractures' morphological features and acromioclavicular dislocation degree were assessed. By referring to the data collected by the my research group on Chinese people's coracoclavicular ligament, the injuries of the coracoclavicular ligament were estimated, which was then to verify the actual injuries detected during operation. Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction was performed on patients and screws or suture anchors fixing small bone blocks was used as an adjuvant therapy. Clinical and radiological follow-up was at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. The clinical outcomes were assessed pre- and postoperatively with Constant Scores. Anteroposterior radiographs for the bilateral acromioclavicular joints were obtained immediately after surgery and every follow-up.To compare the reduction maintenance, coracoclavicular distances of the injured shoulders were measured in preoperative and postoperative standard radiographs. Results: All patients received satisfactory fracture and acromioclavicular joint reduction. The average follow-up period was (12.6±3.9) months (ranging from 6 to 22 months). Fractures healed six months after the operation. The coracoclavicular distances increased from (7.8±1.4)mm at one month follow-up to (7.9±1.2)mm at the final follow-up (P>0.05), which could be considered as no difference statistically. The constant score significantly increased from (49.1±4.4) at one month follow-up to (93.8±2.1) at the final evaluation (P<0.001). Obvious loss of acromioclavicular joint reduction was not observed after the operation. Coracoid process and calvicle fractures did not appear. Fractures healed well and shoulder joints also functioned well. Patients' lives and work went back to normal. Conclusion: Accompanied by ligament injuries, distal clavicle fractures is different from middle fractures. Coracoclavicular ligament injury is a major cause of the acromioclavicular joint instability, and the focus of the surgery. Therefore, the application of the double-bundle coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction is a feasible method to treat distal clavicle fractures, displaying satisfying clinical results.