Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating quality in endoscopy.

Heiko Pohl1,2

  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, VA White River Junction, Vermont, United States.

Endoscopy
|April 12, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

TEMPORARY REMOVAL: Sustainability indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a framework proposed by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2026
Same author

Inter and intra-observer agreement for the LST Classification in Large (>2cm) Colorectal Laterally Spreading Tumours.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Regression of central sensitization after bilateral focused ultrasound medial thalamotomies in atypical orofacial pain? - a case report.

BMC neurology·2026
Same author

Sustainability in endoscopic medical congresses and courses: Position Statement from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates.

Endoscopy·2026
Same author

Expert Endoscopist Agreement for Size Measurement of Large (> 2 cm) Colorectal Laterally Spreading Tumors: A Prospective Video-Based Study.

Digestive diseases and sciences·2026
Same author

Through-the-scope clip with anchor prongs for defect closure following myotomy, resection, anti-reflux mucosectomy, fistula management, or bleeding.

Endoscopy international open·2026
Same journal

Correction: A novel technique for endoscopic stepwise clamping and resection of giant pedunculated colonic polyps.

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Feasibility and safety of an adaptive endoscopic resection algorithm guided by the muscle-retracting sign for early rectal cancer.

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Is ERCP losing its dominance to endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction?

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for distal malignant biliary obstruction: It's not the tool - but knowing which one to use!

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Endoscopic closure of a large gastric mucosal defect using a novel endoscopic suturing device in a porcine model.

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Anchor clip-assisted detachable loop ligation for definitive hemostasis and closure of a high-risk bleeding gastric ulcer.

Endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

Evaluating endoscopy quality is complex. This article proposes a broader, four-perspective approach—patient, cultural, care, and societal—to improve quality assessment and patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Medical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Endoscopy quality evaluation is challenging, with most measures focusing on procedural aspects.
  • Existing quality measures often lack clear links to clinically significant patient outcomes.
  • Patient expectations, cultural values, and care settings are underrepresented in current quality assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To broaden the scope of quality assessment in endoscopy.
  • To introduce a multi-dimensional framework for evaluating endoscopy quality.
  • To propose a more comprehensive approach to measuring endoscopy quality.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual framework development.
  • Review of existing quality measures in endoscopy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of quality from individual patient, cultural, individual care, and societal perspectives.

    • Main Results:

    • Current quality measures are predominantly process-oriented and lack outcome-based evidence.
    • A four-perspective model (patient, cultural, care, societal) offers a more holistic view of endoscopy quality.
    • Bundled composite measures are suggested for a comprehensive quality assessment approach.

    Conclusions:

    • A broader perspective encompassing patient, cultural, care, and societal factors is essential for robust endoscopy quality evaluation.
    • Bundled composite measures offer a practical solution for comprehensive quality assessment in endoscopy.
    • Integrating diverse perspectives can lead to improved patient care and outcomes in endoscopic procedures.