Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Molecular Models02:00

Molecular Models

Physical models representing molecular architectures of chemical compounds play essential roles in understanding chemistry. The use of molecular models makes it easier to visualize the structures and shapes of atoms and molecules.
Structure of Benzene: Molecular Orbital Model01:18

Structure of Benzene: Molecular Orbital Model

According to the molecular orbital (MO) model, benzene has a planar structure with a regular hexagon of six sp2 hybridized carbons. As shown in Figure 1, each carbon is bonded to three other atoms with C–C–C and H–C–C bond angles of 120°. The C–H bond length is 109 pm, and the C–C bond length is 139 pm which is midway between the single bond length of sp3 hybridized carbons (154 pm) and sp2 hybridized carbons (133 pm).
Radical Anti-Markovnikov Addition to Alkenes: Overview01:25

Radical Anti-Markovnikov Addition to Alkenes: Overview

The addition of hydrogen bromide to alkenes in the presence of hydroperoxides or peroxides proceeds via an anti-Markovnikov pathway and yields alkyl bromides.
Radical Anti-Markovnikov Addition to Alkenes: Thermodynamics01:32

Radical Anti-Markovnikov Addition to Alkenes: Thermodynamics

The anti-Markovnikov addition of hydrogen halides to an alkene is thermodynamically feasible only with HBr. The radical addition reaction with other hydrogen halides like HCl and HI is thermodynamically unfavorable.
State Space Representation01:27

State Space Representation

The frequency-domain technique, commonly used in analyzing and designing feedback control systems, is effective for linear, time-invariant systems. However, it falls short when dealing with nonlinear, time-varying, and multiple-input multiple-output systems. The time-domain or state-space approach addresses these limitations by utilizing state variables to construct simultaneous, first-order differential equations, known as state equations, for an nth-order system.
Consider an RLC circuit, a...
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models01:21

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

Mechanistic models, a category encompassing both physiological and compartmental modeling, differ from empirical models' approaches to incorporating known factors about the systems being modeled. Empirical models describe data with minimal assumptions, while mechanistic models aim to provide a robust description of available data by specifying assumptions and integrating known factors about the system. Compartmental analysis is a key example of a mechanistic model in pharmacokinetics and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural assemblies revealed by inferred connectivity-based models of prefrontal cortex recordings.

Journal of computational neuroscience·2016
Same author

Transitions between Spatial Attractors in Place-Cell Models.

Physical review letters·2015
Same author

Large pseudocounts and L2-norm penalties are necessary for the mean-field inference of Ising and Potts models.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2014
Same author

Stochastic ratchet mechanisms for replacement of proteins bound to DNA.

Physical review letters·2014
Same author

Crosstalk and transitions between multiple spatial maps in an attractor neural network model of the hippocampus: collective motion of the activity.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2014
Same author

Crosstalk and transitions between multiple spatial maps in an attractor neural network model of the hippocampus: phase diagram.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Visualization of Cortical Modules in Flattened Mammalian Cortices
08:49

Visualization of Cortical Modules in Flattened Mammalian Cortices

Published on: January 22, 2018

Emergence of Compositional Representations in Restricted Boltzmann Machines.

J Tubiana1, R Monasson1

  • 1Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, Ecole Normale Supérieure and CNRS, PSL Research, Sorbonne Universités UPMC, 24 rue Lhomond, 75005 Paris, France.

Physical Review Letters
|April 15, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) effectively extract complex features from high-dimensional data. Specific structural conditions enable RBMs to generate distributed representations, enhancing machine learning performance.

More Related Videos

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Visualization of Cortical Modules in Flattened Mammalian Cortices
08:49

Visualization of Cortical Modules in Flattened Mammalian Cortices

Published on: January 22, 2018

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • High-dimensional data feature extraction is vital for machine learning.
  • Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) are known for efficient feature extraction and data representation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify structural conditions enabling RBMs to operate in a compositional phase.
  • To understand how RBMs generate distributed and graded data representations.

Main Methods:

  • Replica analysis of a statistical ensemble of random RBMs.
  • Training RBMs on the MNIST handwritten digits dataset.

Main Results:

  • Characterization of structural conditions for compositional RBMs: weight sparsity, low temperature, nonlinear hidden unit activations, and visible layer field adaptation.
  • Empirical validation on the MNIST dataset.

Conclusions:

  • The identified structural conditions are key for RBMs to achieve compositional feature extraction.
  • These findings contribute to understanding RBMs' effectiveness in machine learning and data representation.