Related Experiment Videos
Comparison of bioelectrical impedance and DXA for measuring body composition among adults with Down syndrome
Michael R Esco1, Brett S Nickerson2, Angela R Russell3
1Department of Kinesiology, University of Alabama, USA.
Background:
Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) have been shown to display high levels of adiposity and a unique body shape. Laboratory methods used to evaluate body composition might be too cumbersome for this special population. Therefore, field methods are desired due to their non-invasive nature.
Objective:
to determine the agreement between dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for measuring body fat percentage BF% and fat-free mass (FFM) among adults with DS.
Methods:
Twenty-one adults (male: n = 10; female: n = 11) with DS participated in this study. BF% and FFM were determined by DXA and BIA.
Results:
There was a significant mean difference between DXA and BIA for BF% (41.33 ± 8.98% and 34.23 ± 9.22%, respectively) and FFM (41.80 ± 8.74 kg and 46.95 ± 9.92 kg, respectively). The correlation between the two devices for BF% and FFM were significant (r = 0.89 and r = 0.94, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). The standard error of estimate and total error values were 4.38% and 8.27%, respectively, for BF% and 3.04 kg and 6.13 kg, respectively, for FFM. The 95% limits of agreement ranged from -15.64% below to 1.46% above the constant error (CE) of -7.09% for BF% and from -1.52 kg below to 11.83 kg above the CE of 5.15 kg for FFM.
Conclusions:
The significant mean differences and large amount of individual error suggest that BIA may not be an appropriate surrogate body composition measure compared to DXA in adults with DS.