Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2026

Imaging In-Stent Restenosis: An Inexpensive, Reliable, and Rapid Preclinical Model
Published on: September 14, 2009
Procedural and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion
Lorenzo Azzalini1, Rustem Dautov2, Soledad Ojeda3
1Division of Interventional Cardiology, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Insights
In-stent chronic total occlusion (IS-CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) shows high procedural success but increased long-term adverse cardiac events, primarily driven by target-vessel revascularization.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent chronic total occlusion (IS-CTO) has historically faced challenges with suboptimal success rates.
- Understanding the long-term outcomes and predictors of adverse events in IS-CTO PCI is crucial for improving patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the long-term outcomes and identify predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) following PCI in patients with IS-CTO.
- To compare the outcomes of IS-CTO PCI with de novo chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter registry study involving 899 patients undergoing CTO PCI across three specialized centers.
- Patients were categorized into IS-CTO (n=111) and de novo CTO (n=788) groups.
- The primary endpoint was MACE, a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR), assessed via Cox regression analysis.
Main Results:
- Procedural success rates were high and comparable between IS-CTO (86.5%) and de novo CTO (86.5%) groups.
- At a median follow-up of 471 days, MACE occurred in 20.8% of IS-CTO patients versus 13.9% of de novo CTO patients (p=0.07).
- TVR was significantly higher in the IS-CTO group (16.7% vs. 9.4%; p=0.03), and IS-CTO was an independent predictor of MACE (HR 2.16; p=0.01).
Conclusions:
- While procedural success for IS-CTO PCI is similar to de novo CTO PCI, IS-CTO is an independent predictor of long-term MACE.
- Target-vessel revascularization is the primary driver of increased MACE in the IS-CTO group.
- Factors such as prior surgical revascularization, renal function, indication for acute coronary syndrome, number of diseased vessels, and the PROGRESS-CTO score also predict MACE.
Objectives:
The study sought to investigate the long-term outcomes and predictors of adverse events of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent chronic total occlusion (IS-CTO).
Background:
IS-CTO PCI has traditionally been associated with suboptimal success rates.
Methods:
We performed a multicenter registry of consecutive patients undergoing CTO PCI at 3 specialized centers. Patients were divided in IS-CTO and de novo CTO. The primary endpoint (major adverse cardiac events [MACE]) was a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR) on follow-up. Independent predictors of MACE were sought with Cox regression.
Results:
We included 899 patients (n = 111 IS-CTO, n = 788 de novo CTO). Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were balanced between the 2 groups. Overall mean J-CTO (Japanese-Chronic Total Occlusion) score was 1.88 ± 1.24 and mean PROGRESS-CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention-CTO) score was 1.04 ± 0.88. Antegrade wire escalation was used in 59.0% of IS-CTO and 48.1% of de novo CTO patients (p = 0.08). Procedural success was achieved in 86.5% in both groups (p = 0.99). After a median follow-up of 471 (interquartile range: 354 to 872) days, MACE were observed in 20.8% versus 13.9% in IS-CTO versus de novo CTO (p = 0.07), driven by TVR (16.7% vs. 9.4%; p = 0.03). IS-CTO was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio: 2.16; 95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 3.95; p = 0.01), together with prior surgical revascularization and renal function, CTO PCI indicated for acute coronary syndrome, number of diseased vessels, and PROGRESS-CTO score.
Conclusions:
Procedural success was high and similar in patients with IS-CTO, as compared with de novo CTO. However, IS-CTO was independently associated with MACE (driven by TVR) on follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

