Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2026

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial
Michael T Lu1, Maros Ferencik2, Rhonda S Roberts3
1Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Insights
Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography (FFRCT) better predicts cardiac events than coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) stenosis. Adding FFRCT can improve the efficiency of invasive coronary angiography referrals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Medical Diagnostics
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) provides anatomic information but has limitations in predicting functional significance of coronary stenosis.
- Stable chest pain is a common indication for non-invasive cardiac imaging and subsequent invasive procedures.
- Fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography (FFRCT) offers a noninvasive method to assess the functional impact of coronary artery disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if FFRCT predicts coronary revascularization and adverse cardiac events in patients with stable chest pain.
- To determine if incorporating FFRCT enhances the efficiency of referral to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) after CTA.
- To compare the predictive value of FFRCT against traditional CTA stenosis assessment.
Main Methods:
- An observational cohort study of patients from the PROMISE trial with stable chest pain referred for ICA post-CTA.
- FFRCT was calculated by a blinded core laboratory; results were not available to clinicians.
- Agreement between FFRCT and stenosis on CTA/ICA was assessed, along with predictive value for revascularization or major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Main Results:
- FFRCT was calculated in 67% of eligible patients; it was discordant with CTA and ICA stenosis in 31% and 29% of cases, respectively.
- An FFRCT threshold of ≤0.80 was a significantly better predictor of revascularization or MACE compared to severe CTA stenosis (HR 4.3 vs. 2.9).
- Utilizing FFRCT ≤0.80 as a gatekeeper could reduce unnecessary ICAs by 44% and increase revascularization rates by 24%.
Conclusions:
- FFRCT ≤0.80 is a superior predictor of revascularization or MACE than severe stenosis on CTA in patients with stable chest pain.
- Integrating FFRCT into the diagnostic pathway following CTA has the potential to optimize referral patterns for invasive coronary angiography.
- This approach may improve the efficiency and yield of invasive coronary angiography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease.
Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to determine whether noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography (FFRCT) predicts coronary revascularization and outcomes and whether its addition improves efficiency of referral to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) after coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA).
Background:
FFRCT may improve the efficiency of an anatomic CTA strategy for stable chest pain.
Methods:
This observational cohort study included patients with stable chest pain in the PROMISE (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) trial referred to ICA within 90 days after CTA. FFRCT was measured at a blinded core laboratory, and FFRCT results were unavailable to caregivers. We determined the agreement of FFRCT (positive if ≤0.80) with stenosis on CTA and ICA (positive if ≥50% left main or ≥70% other coronary artery), and predictive value for a composite of coronary revascularization or major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina). We retrospectively assessed whether adding FFRCT ≤0.80 as a gatekeeper could improve efficiency of referral to ICA, defined as decreased rate of ICA without ≥50% stenosis and increased ICA leading to revascularization.
Results:
FFRCT was calculated in 67% (181 of 271) of eligible patients (mean age 62 years; 36% women). FFRCT was discordant with stenosis in 31% (57 of 181) for CTA and 29% (52 of 181) for ICA. Most patients undergoing coronary revascularization had an FFRCT of ≤0.80 (91%; 80 of 88). An FFRCT of ≤0.80 was a significantly better predictor for revascularization or major adverse cardiac events than severe CTA stenosis (HR: 4.3 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4 to 8.9] vs. 2.9 [95% CI: 1.8 to 5.1]; p = 0.033). Reserving ICA for patients with an FFRCT of ≤0.80 could decrease ICA without ≥50% stenosis by 44%, and increase the proportion of ICA leading to revascularization by 24%.
Conclusions:
In this hypothesis-generating study of patients with stable chest pain referred to ICA from CTA, an FFRCT of ≤0.80 was a better predictor of revascularization or major adverse cardiac events than severe stenosis on CTA. Adding FFRCT may improve efficiency of referral to ICA from CTA alone.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

